BHARATSINGH AMARSINGH RAJPUT,BHARATPUR vs. THE PCIT, VADODARA-1, VADODARA

ITA 467/AHD/2023Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad27 May 2024AY 2018-19Bench: SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA (Accountant Member)21 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the AO's orders were erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue because exemptions were allowed without proper inquiry, and in some cases, more exemption was allowed than the amount received. The annuity payments made by the employer were considered remuneration and taxable as salary.

What were the facts?

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) initiated proceedings under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against multiple employees of GE Power India Ltd. The PCIT found that the Assessing Officer (AO) had erroneously allowed exemptions on salary income, particularly concerning Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) benefits, without proper verification.

What were the issues?

Whether the Assessing Officer's allowance of exemptions on VRS benefits and annuity payments was erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue, justifying revision under Section 263.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263,Section 17(1),Section 10(10CC),Section 10(10B),Section 40(a)(v)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Heard together (4 matters)

I.T.A. No. 463/Ahd/2023
I.T.A. No. 464/Ahd/2023
I.T.A. No. 465/Ahd/2023
ITA Nos. 466/Ahd/2023

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

BEFORE SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 463/Ahd/2023 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2018-19) बनाम/ Mafatbhai Bhikhabhai The PCIT, Vadodara-1, Parmar Baroda Vs. C/O J N Goyal & Company, C-162, Ranjeet Nagar, Bharatpur, Rajasthan 321001 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AVUPP0615R (Appellant) .. (Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 464/Ahd/2023 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2018-19) बनाम/ Jitendra Kumar Shimpi The PCIT, Vadodara-1, C/O J N Goyal & Baroda Vs. Company, C-162, Ranjeet Nagar, Bharatpur, Rajasthan 321001 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : BRSPS0325Q (Appellant) .. (Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 465/Ahd/2023 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2018-19) बनाम/ Mahendra Ambalal Patel The PCIT, Vadodara-1, C/O J N Goyal & Baroda Vs. Company, C-162, Ranjeet Nagar, Bharatpur, Rajasthan 321001 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AODPR2336H (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

ITA Nos. 466/Ahd/2023 (Imtiyaz Karimbhai Vhora vs. PCIT) & 8 Ors. A.Y.– 2018-19 - 2 – आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 466/Ahd/2023 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessme

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →