THE ACIT, MEHSANA CIRCLE, MEHSANA vs. SHRI UMESH VADILAL KHAMAR, MEHSANA

ITA 1136/AHD/2019Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 July 2024AY 2014-15Bench: MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE (Judicial Member), SHRI MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR (Accountant Member)18 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete most of the additions made by the AO, finding that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence and explanations for the transactions. A partial disallowance for cash payments was sustained.

What were the facts?

During a survey, the assessee admitted to earning unaccounted income of Rs. 1,19,04,949/-. The Assessing Officer made several additions based on this and other discrepancies found.

What were the issues?

The primary issues revolved around the validity of the assessee's retraction from his initial admission of unaccounted income and the allowability of cash payments made in the agricultural sector.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 133A,Section 143(3),Section 40A(3),Section 69C,Section 145(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “ D ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE & SHRI MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR

For Appellant: Shri Bharat Trivedi, AR
Hearing: 02/07/2024Pronounced: 16/07/2024

PER SHRI MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR, AM:

The captioned appeal has been filed by the Department against the order dated 26/04/2019 passed by the Learned Commissio

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 133A

All 5,893 judgments and leading authorities on Section 133A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →