M/S. BANCO ALUMINIUM LTD.,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1(1), BARODA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee was eligible for deduction under Section 80IA(4) for its captive power generation plant. The Tribunal also found that the expenditure on spares for machinery was revenue in nature, not capital.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80IA(4) for its captive power generation plant. The Assessing Officer disallowed this deduction, re-computed profits by adjusting the sale value of power, and initiated penalty proceedings. The assessee argued that all conditions for the deduction were met.
What were the issues?
Whether the captive power generation plant is eligible for deduction under Section 80IA(4), and whether expenditure on machinery spares is revenue or capital expenditure.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- 100 TT J 224 (IT AT Kolkatta) 4. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. v. JCIT48 citing16 SOT 509 · 2007 · ITAT
- West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. v. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax23 citing103 ITD 19 · 2006 · ITAT
- Mohan Breweries & Distilleries Ltd. v. ACIT5 citing114 TTJ 532 · ITAT
- Assam Carbon Products Ltd. v. ACIT3 citing10 SOT 106 · 2006 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “ D ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA & SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER :
These are two appeals by the assessee and department against the separate orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-1, Vadodara,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80IA
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Klsr Infratech Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT, Central Circle-1(2), HyderabadITA 2323/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026