SANGLI DISTRICT LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OP. SOCIETIES CO-OP. FEDERATION LIMITED SANGLI.,SANGLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SANGLI MAHARASHTRA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issue of addition of interest income to the file of the Assessing Officer for denovo adjudication. Consequently, the penalty matter was also restored to the Assessing Officer.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative society, filed its return claiming deductions under Section 80P. The Assessing Officer disallowed these deductions and initiated penalty proceedings under Section 270A. The penalty was confirmed by the NFAC.
What were the issues?
Whether penalty under Section 270A can be levied on disallowance of deduction under Section 80P. The quantum appeal's outcome necessitated the remand of the penalty proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & MS. ASTHA CHANDRA
आदेश / ORDER
PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi dated 06.12.2023 levying penalty of Rs.10,14,828/- u/s.270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’) for the A.Y. 2021-22.
Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is a Cooperative society duly registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. It is engaged in federation of labour societies under Sangli District. The Return of Income for the A.Y.2021-22 was filed on 04.02.2022 declaring total income of Rs.63,016/- after claiming deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’). Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer (AO) vide order dated 09.12.2022 u/s.143(3) r.w.s.144B of the Act at a total income of Rs.65,68,330/-. While doing so, the AO had disallowed the claim for deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(vi) of the Act on the ground that the income shown in the return of income was not derived from the activity of collective disposal of labour. The AO also had disallowed the interest of Rs.22,77,800/- claimed u/s.80P(2)(d) of the Act on the ground that such deduction was not claimed in the return of income. The AO also initiated penalty proceedings u/s.270A. In response to the show cause notice, the appellant society submitted that penalty u/s.270A cannot be levied on mere disallowance of claim. However, rejecting the contention made by the appellant society, the AO levied penalty of Rs.10,14,828/- u/s.270A of the Act on the ground of under reporting of income.
Being aggrieved by the above penalty order, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A)/NFAC who vide impugned order confirmed the penalty levied by the AO.
Being aggrieved, the appellant society is in appeal before the Tribunal in the present appeal.
We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. In the quantum appeal preferred by the appellant society in we restored the issue of addition of interest income earned by the appellant society from the FDs made with Sangli District Central Co.op Bank Ltd. to the file of Assessing Officer for denovo adjudication with a direction to allow the deduction, on being satisfied on verification that the interest income is earned from a Cooperative Society, subject to fulfillment of other conditions.
In the circumstances, the penalty matter is also being restored to the file of Assessing Officer, consequent to the remand order passed by this Tribunal in the quantum appeal.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed. Order pronounced on this 05th day of August, 2024.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026