SANGLI DISTRICT LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OP. SOCIETIES CO-OP. FEDERATION LIMITED SANGLI.,SANGLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SANGLI MAHARASHTRA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 151/PUN/2024Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 August 2024AY 2021-22Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), MS. ASTHA CHANDRA (Judicial Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the issue of addition of interest income to the file of the Assessing Officer for denovo adjudication. Consequently, the penalty matter was also restored to the Assessing Officer.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a cooperative society, filed its return claiming deductions under Section 80P. The Assessing Officer disallowed these deductions and initiated penalty proceedings under Section 270A. The penalty was confirmed by the NFAC.

What were the issues?

Whether penalty under Section 270A can be levied on disallowance of deduction under Section 80P. The quantum appeal's outcome necessitated the remand of the penalty proceedings.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80P,Section 270A,Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & MS. ASTHA CHANDRA

For Appellant: Shri Amit Shintre &, Shri Sudhir Shintre (through Virtual)
For Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari
Hearing: 24.07.2024Pronounced: 05.08.2024

आदेश / ORDER

PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM:

1.

This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi dated 06.12.2023 levying penalty of Rs.10,14,828/- u/s.270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’) for the A.Y. 2021-22.

2.

Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is a Cooperative society duly registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. It is engaged in federation of labour societies under Sangli District. The Return of Income for the A.Y.2021-22 was filed on 04.02.2022 declaring total income of Rs.63,016/- after claiming deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’). Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer (AO) vide order dated 09.12.2022 u/s.143(3) r.w.s.144B of the Act at a total income of Rs.65,68,330/-. While doing so, the AO had disallowed the claim for deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(vi) of the Act on the ground that the income shown in the return of income was not derived from the activity of collective disposal of labour. The AO also had disallowed the interest of Rs.22,77,800/- claimed u/s.80P(2)(d) of the Act on the ground that such deduction was not claimed in the return of income. The AO also initiated penalty proceedings u/s.270A. In response to the show cause notice, the appellant society submitted that penalty u/s.270A cannot be levied on mere disallowance of claim. However, rejecting the contention made by the appellant society, the AO levied penalty of Rs.10,14,828/- u/s.270A of the Act on the ground of under reporting of income.

3.

Being aggrieved by the above penalty order, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A)/NFAC who vide impugned order confirmed the penalty levied by the AO.

4.

Being aggrieved, the appellant society is in appeal before the Tribunal in the present appeal.

5.

We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. In the quantum appeal preferred by the appellant society in we restored the issue of addition of interest income earned by the appellant society from the FDs made with Sangli District Central Co.op Bank Ltd. to the file of Assessing Officer for denovo adjudication with a direction to allow the deduction, on being satisfied on verification that the interest income is earned from a Cooperative Society, subject to fulfillment of other conditions.

6.

In the circumstances, the penalty matter is also being restored to the file of Assessing Officer, consequent to the remand order passed by this Tribunal in the quantum appeal.

7.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed. Order pronounced on this 05th day of August, 2024.

More judgments on Section 80P

All 5,069 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →