MANOJ KUMAR JAIN PROP. MS BAJAJ RE ROLLING MILLS,KOTA vs. ITO(TDS), KOTA, KOTA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the delay in filing Form 27C was a technical breach that could be condoned, especially when the buyer had filed their return and accounted for the income. For interest payments, the assessee was given an opportunity to furnish a certificate from an accountant.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a scrap dealer, was found to have sold scrap without collecting tax at source and obtaining Form 27C. The Assessing Officer raised demands under sections 201(1)/201(1A) for non-collection of tax. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal for one year, stating no submissions were filed, while deciding other years on merit.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is liable for TCS when Form 27C was filed belatedly, and whether an opportunity should be granted to furnish a certificate under the proviso to Section 201(1) for non-deduction of TDS on interest payments.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 206C,Section 201(1),Section 201(1A),Section 139,Section 194A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. A.N. Arunachalam106 citing208 ITR 481 · 1994 · HC
- CIT v. Adisankara Spinning Mills (P.) Ltd.14 citing362 ITR 233 · 2014 · HC
- Chandmal Sancheti v. ITO13 citing72 Taxmann.com 237 · 2016
- CIT (TDS) v. Siyaram Metal Udyog (P.) Ltd.11 citing240 Taxmann 578 · 2016 · HC
- G.K. Traders v. ITO10 citing198 ITD 72 · 2022 · ITAT
- CIT v. Chhaganbhai K Manoj Kumar Jain5 citing94 Taxmann.com 459 · 2018 · HC
- Divisional Forest Officer v. ITO(TDS)4 citing57 Taxmann.com 238 · HC
- Sri Jayabharath Timber Depot v. ITO3 citing150 Taxmann.com 360
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR
Before: HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM &
PER BENCH : These appeals by the assessee are directed against the three separate orders dated 01.08.2023 of ld. CIT (A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi passed under section 250 of the IT Act, 1961 for the assessment years 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19. The asses
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 206C
- Abc Construction, Murshidabad vs I.T.O., Ward - 42(1), MurshidabadITA 703/KOL/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
- Income Tax Officer, Ward - 42(1)… vs Abc Construction, BerhmaporeITA 3070/KOL/2025[2023-24]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Aggarwal Iron & Steel Corporation, Ludhiana vs Jao Income Tax Officer Ward 5(1), LudhianaITA 903/CHANDI/2026[2022-2023]Status: Disposed2 Sept 2026AY 2022-2023
- Shree Shanker Trading Co, Udaipur vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS…ITA 212/JODH/2023[2015-16]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2015-16
- Shree Shankar Trading Co., Udaipur vs Income Tax Officer (TDS), UdaipurITA 202/JODH/2023[2014-15]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026