MANOJ KUMAR JAIN, PROP. MS BAJAJ RE ROLLING MILLS,KOTA vs. ITO(TDS), KOTA, KOTA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the delay in filing Form 27C was a technical breach and condonable, citing High Court and ITAT decisions. For interest payments, the Tribunal allowed an opportunity to furnish a certificate from an accountant under the proviso to section 201(1).
What were the facts?
The assessee, a scrap dealer, was found to have sold scrap without collecting tax at source and obtaining Form 27C. The Assessing Officer raised demands under sections 201(1)/201(1A) for non-collection of tax. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal for one year, stating no submissions were filed, while deciding other years on merit.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can be held liable for non-collection of tax at source when Form 27C was belatedly filed, and whether an opportunity should be granted to furnish a certificate under the proviso to section 201(1) for interest payments.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 206C,Section 201(1),Section 201(1A),Section 139,Section 27C,Section 27BA,Section 194A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. A.N. Arunachalam106 citing208 ITR 481 · 1994 · HC
- CIT v. Adisankara Spinning Mills (P.) Ltd.14 citing362 ITR 233 · 2014 · HC
- Chandmal Sancheti v. ITO13 citing72 Taxmann.com 237 · 2016
- CIT (TDS) v. Siyaram Metal Udyog (P.) Ltd.11 citing240 Taxmann 578 · 2016 · HC
- G.K. Traders v. ITO10 citing198 ITD 72 · 2022 · ITAT
- CIT v. Chhaganbhai K Manoj Kumar Jain5 citing94 Taxmann.com 459 · 2018 · HC
- Divisional Forest Officer v. ITO(TDS)4 citing57 Taxmann.com 238 · HC
- Sri Jayabharath Timber Depot v. ITO3 citing150 Taxmann.com 360
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR
Before: HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM &
vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत
More judgments on Section 206C
- Abc Construction, Murshidabad vs I.T.O., Ward - 42(1), MurshidabadITA 703/KOL/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
- Income Tax Officer, Ward - 42(1)… vs Abc Construction, BerhmaporeITA 3070/KOL/2025[2023-24]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Aggarwal Iron & Steel Corporation, Ludhiana vs Jao Income Tax Officer Ward 5(1), LudhianaITA 903/CHANDI/2026[2022-2023]Status: Disposed2 Sept 2026AY 2022-2023
- Shree Shanker Trading Co, Udaipur vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS…ITA 212/JODH/2023[2015-16]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2015-16
- Shree Shankar Trading Co., Udaipur vs Income Tax Officer (TDS), UdaipurITA 202/JODH/2023[2014-15]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026