DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S LEASE PLAN INDIA LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal based on CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, which stipulates that departmental appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 10 lakhs should not be filed before the ITAT. The dismissal was without going into the merits of the case.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT concerning Assessment Year 2006-07. The tax effect involved in the appeal was less than Rs. 10 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal filed by the Revenue with a tax effect below the prescribed limit in a CBDT circular is maintainable before the ITAT.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “D” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI S.V. MEHROTRA : & SMT. BEENA PILLAI :
\IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “D” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI S.V. MEHROTRA : ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI : JUDICIAL MEMBER Asstt. Yr: 2006-07 DCIT Circle 4(1), Vs. M/s lease Plan India Ltd., New Delhi. 301, CA Chambers, 2183-84/62, Naiwala, Gurudwara Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. PAN: AAACL 6053 B ( Appellant ) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Raman Kant Garg Sr. DR Respondent by : Shri Aditya Vohra adv. Date of hearing : 07/01/2016. Date of order : 12/01/2016. O R D E R PER S.V. MEHROTRA, A.M:
This is revenue’s appeal against the order dated 18.10.2010, passed by the ld. CIT(A)-VII, New Delhi, relating to A.Y. 2006-07.
Apparently, the tax effect involved in the present departmental appeal is less than Rs. 10 lakhs. The recent CBDT Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 stipulates that no departmental appeal, involving tax effect below Rs.10 lakhs, shall be filed before the ITAT. Para 10 of the Circular specifies that such instruction would apply retrospectively and the pending appeals below the specified tax limit of Rs.10 lakh may be withdrawn/not pressed.
Ld. DR could not controvert the aforementioned factual position. He, however, referring to clarification given in paragraph 7 of the Circular, submitted that withdrawal of the appeal by the Revenue on account of low tax effect should not be considered as a precedent in the subsequent years of the acceptance of issues involved in this appeal and, therefore, if in the subsequent year similar issue arises before the ITAT, where the appeal is above the tax limit, as prescribed in this Circular, the same should be decided on merits.
Since the tax effect involved in the present departmental appeal is below 10 lakhs, therefore, in view of recent CBDT Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, this appeal is not maintainable in terms of section 268A(1) of the Income-tax Act. However, we may clarify that if on receipt of this order, the Assessing Officer finds that the tax effect involved is above Rs.10 lacs or in any other manner, the circular is not applicable in view of exceptions culled out in the circular, he will be at liberty to take such steps, as deem fit, to recall the order. We also agree with the contention of the learned CIT(DR) that this order would not be considered as an acceptance by the Revenue on the issue involved in this appeal and will not be an estoppel for the Revenue to take up the issue involved in this appeal before the ITAT on merits if the tax effect in those years is more than 10 lakhs.
Keeping in view the aforementioned CBDT Circular and the provisions of section 268A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, without going into merits of the cases, we dismiss the instant appeal filed by the Revenue as tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.10.00 lacs.
Order pronouncement in open court on 12/01/2016.
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026