Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A”, BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SANJAY ARORA, AM & SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JM Shri Amrutlal V. Chheda,
Appellant by : Shri B.D. Naik (DR) Respondent by : Shri Bhupendra Shah Date of Hearing : 18/05/2016 Date of Order : 18/05/2016 O R D E R
PER PAWAN SINGH, JM:
The above appeal is filed by the Assessing Officer (AO) raising only one Ground of appeal
for the assessment year mentioned above. The tax effect involved in the above referred case is below the monetary limit (Rs. 10,00,000/-) prescribed by the Central Board of Director Taxes(CBDT), vide its Circular No.21/2015(F.No.142/2007-ITJ (Pt.) dated 10th December, 2015.
2. Shri Bhupendra Shah appeared on behalf of the assessee. The Departmental Representative (DR) on a query by the Bench fairly conceded that the tax effect involved in the above case was less than Rs. 10.00 lacs. Considering these facts, we dismiss the appeal holding them as not maintainable u/s. 268A of the Act. In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
3. Order pronounced in the open court on this 18/05/2016. Sd/- Sd/- (SANJAY ARORA) (PAWAN SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai; Dated : 18/05/2016 SK, PS Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 3. आयकर आयु�त(अपील) / The CIT(A), Mumbai. 4. आयकर आयु�त / CIT