M/S ITI EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,BANGALORE vs. CIT, BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 80P(4) applies only to cooperative banks, not to credit cooperative societies. Therefore, the assessee, being a cooperative society and not a cooperative bank, is eligible for the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative society, claimed deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The CIT invoked Section 263, holding that the assessee was a cooperative bank and thus ineligible for deduction due to Section 80P(4). The CIT directed the AO to redo the assessment disallowing the deduction.
What were the issues?
Whether a credit cooperative society is considered a cooperative bank for the purpose of Section 80P(4) and thus ineligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE
Per N.V. Vasudevan, Judicial Member
This appeal by the assessee is against the order dated 27.3.14 of the CIT, Bangalore IV, Bangalore passed u/s. 263 of the Act.
Assessment of the assessee was completed by the AO u/s. 143(3) of the Act by an order dated 30.11.2011 accepting Nil income. The CIT, in exercise of his powers conferred u/s. 263, by the impugned order, held that the claim of assessee for deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act was not allowable, in the light of provisions of section 80P(4) of the Act. According to the CIT, the assessee was a co-operative bank and therefore provisions of section 80P(4) will apply and income of th
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026