THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S INFORMATICA BUSINESS

PDF · subscribers
RP/199/2016HC KarnatakaKAHC01024827201615 February 2017Bench: S.SUJATHA,JAYANT PATEL4 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court permitted the appellant (Revenue) to withdraw the appeal based on the revised monetary limits for filing appeals. Liberty was granted to revive the appeal if the case falls under specific exceptions.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court against an ITAT order. The Revenue's counsel brought to the court's notice a circular enhancing the monetary limit for filing appeals. The appeal was filed when the monetary limit was lower.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal is maintainable in light of revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the Revenue. Applicability of the revised monetary limits to pending matters.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260-A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R. DEVDAS INCOME TAX APPEAL No.199/2016 BETWEEN: 1. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, 5TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 095.

2.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11(3), 2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANAGALA, BENGALURU-560 095. ... APPELLANTS

(By Sri.ARAVIND.K.V, ADVOCATE AND Sri.DILIP.M, ADVOCATE)

AND: M/S GOPALAN ENTERPRISES INDIA PVT. LTD., NO.5, RICHMOND ROAD, BANGALORE – 561 203.

... RESPONDENT

(BY SMT. SHETALL AND SRI S. PARTHASARATHI, ADVOCATES)

THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260- A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED: 04.09.2015 PASSED IN ITA NO.1059/BANG/2014, FOR THE

ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-2012, PRAYING TO: 1) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE; 2) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN ITA NO.1059/BANG/2014 DATED 04.09.2015, AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-11(3), BENGALURU; 3) TO PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, DEVDAS J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue brings to the notice of this Court a Circular bearing No.17 of 2019 dated 08th August, 2019 wherein the further enhancement of monetary limit for filing of appeals by the Departments before the Income- Tax Appellate Tribunals, High Courts and Special Leave Petitions/Appeals before the Supreme Court stands amended, and by the said amendment the earlier monetary limit of Rs.50,00,000/- (Rupees fifty lakh) has not been raised to Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees one crore). The earlier monetary limit was prescribed as per Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11th July, 2018. In the light of the same, the learned counsel submits that

the appeal is not maintainable and in view of the Circular, the appeal may be permitted to be withdrawn. Further, the learned counsel would also draw the attention of this Court to Clause 10 of the Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11th July, 2018 wherein certain exceptions are carved out. The learned counsel submits that at the present stage it may not be possible for him to submit whether the matter falls under any of the exceptions. Therefore, it is prayed that liberty may be reserved to the appellants to move this Court, if it is found that the matter falls within the exception carved out in Clause 10 of Circular bearing Number 3 of 2018.

2.

On the query of the Court as to whether the Circular is applicable to pending matters, the learned counsel draws the attention of this Court to the communication dated 20th August, 2019 made by the Central Board of Direct Taxation to all the Chief Commissioners of Income Tax clarifying at paragraph No.3 that the monetary limit prescribed in Circular No.17 of 2019 is applicable to all pending Special Leave Petitions, Appeals, Cross Objections and References.

3.

In view of the above, we permit the appellant to withdraw the appeal for the reasons stated above. Liberty is also granted to the appellant to seek revival of this appeal, if it is found that the matter falls within the exception carved out in Clause 10 of Circular bearing No.3 of 2018.

SD/- JUDGE

SD/- JUDGE

Bvk/-

More judgments on Section 260-A

All 2,570 judgments and leading authorities on Section 260-A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →