RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,JAMMU
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court set aside the ITAT's order and remitted the matter back to the respondent for passing fresh orders. This was done in light of a CBDT circular accepting that disallowances under certain sections enhance profits, making Chapter VI-A deductions admissible on the enhanced profit.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed against an ITAT order that dismissed appeals against a CIT(A) order. The CIT(A) had confirmed the disallowance of expenditure under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
What were the issues?
Whether Section 40(a)(ia) can be invoked for disallowing expenditure that is paid or payable on the balance sheet date, and the applicability of a CBDT circular regarding disallowances and Chapter VI-A deductions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA No. 20/2014 1 of 3
Sr. No. 07 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CJ Court Case: ITA 20/2014
Uploaded on:07.04.2026
Rajesh Kumar Gupta S/o Late Shri Ram Krishen Gupta R/o Partapgarh Mohalla, Jammu aged 53 years.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Virinder Bhat, Advocate
Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (2), Jammu
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Suraj Singh Wazir, CGSC
Coram: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 02.04.2026
This appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act 1961 against the order dated 30.01.2014 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Amritsar) Bench, Amritsar (hereinafter to be referred as the Tribunal), whereby the appeals preferred by the parties against order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Jammu dated 15.01.2013 have been dismissed by the learned Tribunal.
ITA No. 20/2014 2 of 3
In terms of order dated 15.01.2013, CIT (A) Jammu confirmed the disallowance of expenditure in light of Section 40(a) (ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This Court, vide order dated 08.10.2014, framed the following substantial questions of law: (i) Whether Sec. 40 (a) (ia) of the Income Tax Act can be invoked to disallow the expenditure, which is paid or which is shown as payable on the date of balance sheet? (ii) Whether the decision of the tribunal lays down correct law? 3. The learned counsel for the respondent has produced Circular No. 37/2016 dated 02.11.2016 of Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, whereby the board has accepted the settled position that the disallowances made under Sections 32, 40(a) (ia), 40A(3), 43B, etc. of the Act and other specific disallowances, related to the business activities against which the Chapter VI-A deduction has been claimed, result in enhancement of the profit of the eligible business, and that deduction under Chapter VI-A is admissible on the profit so enhanced by the disallowance. The said Circular is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that in view of Circular No. 37/2016 dated 02.11.2016, the matter be remitted to the respondent for passing fresh order in accordance with Circular No. 37/2016 dated 02.11.2016.8
ITA No. 20/2014 3 of 3
In view of above, order impugned dated 30.01.2014 is set aside to the extent of dismissal of appeal filed by the appellant and as a natural corollary would result into setting aside the order dated 15.01.2013 passed by CIA-A, Jammu to the extent of the appellant only and the matter is remitted to the respondent for passing fresh orders in accordance with law.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Jammu 02.04.2026 Karam Chand
Whether the order is speaking:
Yes/No.
Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No. KARAM CHAND 2026.03.10 09:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
- The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Ltu) vs Bank of BarodaITA/102/20255 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026