COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S SAP INDIA PVT.LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the appeal. The dismissal was based on a submission by the appellant's counsel that the appeal should not have been preferred in view of a specific circular.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Department filed an appeal against an order of the ITAT. The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act. The assessee was M/s Iron Mountain Information Management India (P) Ltd.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue was maintainable in light of a subsequent circular issued by the CBDT.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA No.23/2016
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JULY 2017
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.23/2016
BETWEEN :
THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
5TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING
80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA
BANGALORE-560 095
THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
CIRCLE-11(4), 2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING
80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA
BANGALORE-560 095
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, STANDING COUNSEL)
AND :
M/S IRON MOUNTAIN INFORMATION MANAGEMENT INDIA (P) LTD., (EARLIER KNOWN AS M/S STRATIFY S/W INDIA P. LTD.,) 2ND FLOOR, TOWER 3, HIBISCUS VRINDAVANA TECH VILLAGE MARATHAHALLI, OUTER RING ROAD VARTHUR HO, BANGALORE-560 037
...RESPONDENT
(BY SMT.TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR FOR SRI T.SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATES)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET
ITA No.23/2016
-2-
ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE ITAT, BENGALURU IN ITA NO.445/BANG/2012 DATED 30/07/2015 CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11(4), BENGALURU.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, H.G.RAMESH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral):
Learned counsel appearing for the appellants fairly submits that, in view of Circular No.21/2015 [F.NO.279/MISC.142/2007-ITJ(PT.)] dated 10.12.2015, this appeal should not have been preferred, and hence, may be dismissed. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. Appeal dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026