GIGEO CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD.,,NAGPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1(3),, NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that due to the moratorium declared by the NCLT, all proceedings against the assessee are prohibited. Therefore, the appeals filed by both the revenue and the assessee are dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee company, M/s. Gigeo Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd., is undergoing insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has prohibited all pending proceedings against the corporate debtor.
What were the issues?
Whether pending appeals before the ITAT can continue when the assessee company is under insolvency proceedings and a moratorium has been imposed by the NCLT.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(7)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Ansal Housing Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd.208 citing354 ITR 180 · 2013 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Crescent Export Syndicate66 citing33 Taxmann.com 250 · 2013 · HC
- Pr. CIT v. Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd.34 citing169 DTR 262 · 2019 · SC
- Murli Industries Limited v. ACIT22 citing441 ITR 8 · 2022 · HC
- CIT v. Sikandarkhan N. Tunvar20 citing33 Taxmann.com 133 · 2013 · HC
- Pratibha Industries Ltd. v. DCIT19 citing212 DTR 133 · 2022
- 304 CTR 2333 citing304 CTR 233 · 2018 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI K.M. ROY, ACCOUNTANT, MEMBER
PER K.M. ROY, A.M.
The Revenue has filed appeals for the assessment year 2007–08 and 2009–10, which arose out of the impugned orders of even date 21/06/2016, and the assessee has also filed its appeal for the assessment year 2003–04,
M/s. Gigeo Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. which arose out of the impugned order dated 28/12/2016. All these appeals have been passed by the learned CIT(A)–3,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- Dy. C.I.T. Central Cir.-1(3), Nagpur vs M/S Gigeo Construction Co.Pvt. Ltd, NagpurNagpur9 Sept 2024Dismissed
Also relies on Pratibha Industries Ltd. v. DCIT and 4 other authorities
The Tribunal held that due to the moratorium declared by the NCLT, all proceedings against the assessee are prohibited. Therefore, the appeals filed by both the revenue and the assessee are dismissed.
- Essar Projects India Ltd, Mumbai vs Asst CIT 6(2)(2), MumbaiMumbai22 Sept 2023Dismissed
Also relies on Pratibha Industries Ltd. v. DCIT and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that the IBC has an overriding effect over other laws, including the Income Tax Act. Consequently, no suit or legal proceedings can be initiated or continued against a corporate debtor in liquidation wi...
- M/S. Gujarat Nre Coke Limited, Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle - 8(1), KolkataKolkata28 Feb 2023Dismissed
Also relies on Pratibha Industries Ltd. v. DCIT and 1 other authority
The tribunal held that the IBC has an overriding effect over the Income-tax Act in case of parallel proceedings. Given that the company is under liquidation and no legal proceedings can be initiated against it, the appea...
- Vasan Health Care Private Limited, Chennai vs ACIT, CC-2(1), ChennaiChennai28 Nov 2022Dismissed
Also relies on Pratibha Industries Ltd. v. DCIT and 1 other authority
The tribunal held that due to the moratorium period under the IBC, no suits or legal proceedings can be instituted or continued against the corporate debtor. Therefore, the appeals filed by both the Revenue and the Asses...
- Trade Line Enterprises Pvt Ltd, Chennai vs ACIT, Corp Cir-3(1), ChennaiChennai26 Oct 2022Dismissed
Also relies on Pratibha Industries Ltd. v. DCIT and 1 other authority
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by both the assessee and the revenue. This was done in light of the moratorium period under the IBC, which prohibits legal proceedings against the corporate debtor.
More judgments on Section 14
- Infra Developers, Shivpuri vs Income Tax Officer, AshoknagarITA 454/AGR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shri Jayantibhai Virjibhai Babariya, SuratWTA 2/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shri Jayantibhai Virjibhai Babariya, SuratWTA 1/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Narayan Industries Global Limited, New Delhi vs DCIT Circle 16(1), DelhiITA 8422/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Manpreet Estates LLP, Mumbai vs ACIT, Central Circle 8(3), MumbaiITA 4386/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026