DY. C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.-1(3), NAGPUR vs. M/S GIGEO CONSTRUCTION CO.PVT. LTD, NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that due to the moratorium declared by the NCLT, all proceedings against the assessee are prohibited. Therefore, the appeals filed by both the revenue and the assessee are dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee company, M/s. Gigeo Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd., is undergoing insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has prohibited all pending proceedings against the corporate debtor.
What were the issues?
Whether pending appeals before the ITAT can continue when the assessee company is under insolvency proceedings and a moratorium has been imposed by the NCLT.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(7)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Ansal Housing Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd.208 citing354 ITR 180 · 2013 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Crescent Export Syndicate66 citing33 Taxmann.com 250 · 2013 · HC
- Pr. CIT v. Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd.34 citing169 DTR 262 · 2019 · SC
- Murli Industries Limited v. ACIT22 citing441 ITR 8 · 2022 · HC
- CIT v. Sikandarkhan N. Tunvar20 citing33 Taxmann.com 133 · 2013 · HC
- Pratibha Industries Ltd. v. DCIT19 citing212 DTR 133 · 2022
- 304 CTR 2333 citing304 CTR 233 · 2018 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI K.M. ROY, ACCOUNTANT, MEMBER
PER K.M. ROY, A.M.
The Revenue has filed appeals for the assessment year 2007–08 and 2009–10, which arose out of the impugned orders of even date 21/06/2016, and the assessee has also filed its appeal for the assessment year 2003–04,
M/s. Gigeo Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. which arose out of the impugned order dated 28/12/2016. All these appeals have been passed by the learned CIT(A)–3,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14
- Infra Developers, Shivpuri vs Income Tax Officer, AshoknagarITA 454/AGR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shri Jayantibhai Virjibhai Babariya, SuratWTA 2/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shri Jayantibhai Virjibhai Babariya, SuratWTA 1/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Narayan Industries Global Limited, New Delhi vs DCIT Circle 16(1), DelhiITA 8422/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Manpreet Estates LLP, Mumbai vs ACIT, Central Circle 8(3), MumbaiITA 4386/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026