GAYATRI SHIKSHA NYAS,AGRA vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), AGRA, AGRA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT condoned the substantial delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) and also a 10-day delay before the ITAT, considering the assessee's charitable activities and the interest of substantial justice. The matter was remitted back to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits, with directions for both parties to cooperate.
What were the facts?
The assessee, an educational trust, filed its return of income, which was processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, treating voluntary contributions as income under Section 11(1)(d). The assessee's rectification application under Section 154 was rejected, leading to a significant delay of 2350 days in filing an appeal before the CIT(A), which was subsequently dismissed due to the delay.
What were the issues?
The key legal issues were the condonation of a significant delay in filing an appeal before the CIT(A) and whether voluntary contributions to an educational trust should be exempt under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) instead of being taxed under Section 11(1)(d).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji3,926 citing167 ITR 471 · 1987 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA (SMC
Before: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN
Both these appeals have been filed by assessee against separate orders of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) -4, Chennai dated 29.08.2025 & 16.09.2025 for the Assessment Years 2016-17 & 2017-18. 2. Since the issues involved in both these appeals are similar, the same were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience and brevity. We take up ITA No. 513/Agr/2025 as a lead case.
ITA No.513 & 520/Agr/2025
In the ITA No. 513/Agr/2025, aggrieved with the above order, assessee is in appeal before ITAT, raising following grounds of appeal :
That the learned CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in dismissing the appeal solely on the ground of delay of 2350 days, without
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026