RAMJIDAS BUDHRAJA CHARITABLE TRUST (SGM),CHHINDWARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER EXEMPTION, JABALPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that proceedings under Section 147 are for the benefit of the Revenue and not the assessee. Therefore, a claim not made in the return of income or during assessment proceedings cannot be allowed for the first time in appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, claimed a deduction for accumulation of income under Section 11(2) of the Income Tax Act. This claim was not made in the original return of income and was first raised during appellate proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether a claim for deduction under Section 11(2) can be allowed for the first time in appellate proceedings when the assessment was initiated under Section 147.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT1,842 citing284 ITR 323 · 2006 · SC
- CIT v. Sun Engineering Works (P) Ltd.814 citing198 ITR 297 · 1992 · SC · Read judgment
- Commissioner of Income-tax v. Motor Industries Company Limited64 citing229 ITR 137 · 1997 · HC
- Assam Company (I) Ltd. v. CIT63 citing256 ITR 423 · 2002 · HC
- Assam Co. (India) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax17 citing133 Taxmann 159 · 2003 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH “DB”, JABALPUR
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA
PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA: A.M. (A) This appeal vide I.T.A. No.235/JBP/2025 has been filed by the assessee for assessment year 2015-16 against impugned appellate order dated 14.07.2025 (DIN & Order No.ITBA/APL/S/250/2025- 26/1078443117(1) of Ld. Addl/JCIT Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), the First Appellate Authority. The grounds of appeal are as under:
“1. The learned CIT appeal has erred in law and on facts of the case, in not permitting the claim of deduction for accumulation of income of rupees 39,00,000/- under section 11(2) of the Income Tax Act. Necessary compliance as per rules was made by the assessee, and form number 10 was submitted before the assessing officer wi
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11(2)
- Kammavari Sangham (Regd), Bengaluru vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1181/BANG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi vs Income Tax Exemption, Ward 1(2), New DelhiITA 1516/DEL/2026[2012 - 2013]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026
- Rkkr Foundation, Chandigarh vs DCIT, Exemption Circle 1, ChandigarhITA 477/CHANDI/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Rkkr Foundation, Chandigarh vs DCIT, Exemption Circle 1, ChandigarhITA 477/CHANDI/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Imc Society of Iti Govt Central Crafts… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward…ITA 1850/CHANDI/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026