ANOOP JAIN HUF,DELHI vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD), CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1 , NOIDA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that additions under Section 153A for unabated assessment years can only be made if incriminating material is found during the search from the assessee's possession. Relying on Supreme Court and High Court judgments, the Tribunal quashed the additions made based on third-party information.
What were the facts?
A search operation was conducted, and subsequently, notices under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act were issued to the assessees for AY 2013-14. Additions were made based on alleged bogus Long Term Capital Gains, commission, and cost of shares.
What were the issues?
Whether additions under Section 153A are permissible in unabated assessment years without incriminating material found from the assessee's possession. Whether reliance on third-party material is sufficient for additions in such cases.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153A,Section 143(3),Section 69A,Section 115BBE,Section 69C,Section 132,Section 139
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(7)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Kabul Chawla3,235 citing380 ITR 573 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
- Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd.2,379 citing454 ITR 212 · 2023 · SC
- PCIT v. Best Infrastructure (India) (P.) Ltd.786 citing84 Taxmann.com 287 · 2017 · HC
- CIT v. Calcutta Knitwears528 citing43 Taxmann.com 446 · 2014 · SC · Read judgment
- PCIT v. Oxygen Business Park (P)Ltd.23 citing157 Taxmann.com 175 · 2023 · HC
- PCIT v. Ankush Saluja10 citing449 ITR 431 · 2019 · HC
- Anoop Jain v. ACIT7 citing181 ITD 218 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “G” BENCH: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM : These three appeals are filed by assessee against the separate orders dated 20.05.2025 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A)-3, Noida [“Ld. CIT(A)”], all are pertaining to Assessment Year 2013-14. ITA No.4038/Del/2018 & Others
As these three appeals are having the issues which are inter- linked, inter-co
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026