ACIT, MEERUT vs. M/S ATS CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE (P) LTD., NOIDA
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals. The dismissal was based on the CBDT's Circular No. 21/2015, which revised the monetary limit for filing appeals to the ITAT to Rs. 10 lakh, and this instruction was binding on the tax authorities.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals against the CIT(A)'s orders for assessment years 2005-06 and 2007-08. The tax effect in these appeals was below the revised monetary limit set by the CBDT.
What were the issues?
Whether the departmental appeals are maintainable given the tax effect is below the revised monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT for filing appeals before the ITAT.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘A’ NEW DELHI
Before: SMT DIVA SINGH & SH.PRASHANT MAHARISHI
Date of Hearing 29.03.2016 Date of Pronouncement 12.05.2016 ORDER PER DIVA SINGH, JM Both these appeals have been filed by the Revenue assailing the correctness of the separate order dated 25.02.2011 of CIT(A), Meerut pertaining to 2005-06 & 2007-08 assessment years on the various ground. 2. The Ld.AR, Mr. Deepak Kapoor appearing on behalf of the assessee, inviting attention to the departmental ground raised submitted that the tax effect in is Rs.9,39,122/- and In ITA No.2315/Del/2015 is Rs.7,50,000/-. Accordingly relying upon the Circular No.21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 of CBDT the Ld. AR submitted that the departmental appeals are not maintainable. The Ld. CIT. DR, Mr. Ravi Jain fairly conceded that the departmental appeals have been filed wherein the tax effect involved is much less than Rs.10 lakh.
3. We have heard the submissions of the parties on this issue and perused the material on record. We find that the CBDT vide the aforesaid Circular dated 10.12.2015 has revised the monetary limit to Rs.10 lakh for filing the appeal by the I.T.A .No.-2314 & 2315/Del/2011 department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Vide para 10 of the aforesaid Circular Para 3 has been made applicable retrospectively. Considering the settled legal precedent that the Board’s instructions or directions issued to the Income Tax Authorities u/s 268A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are binding on the authorities, we dismiss the departmental appeal considering the material available on record.
In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed. The order is pronounced in the open court on 12 May, 2016.
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026