VRIHTAKAR SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT SURGI,RAJNANDGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1, RAJNANDGAON, RAJNANDGAON
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that interest income earned by a cooperative credit society from bank deposits is attributable to its business of providing credit facilities and is therefore eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(d). The assessee is not considered a 'bank' for the purposes of Section 80P(4).
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative society, earned interest on bank deposits. The society claimed this interest income as deductible under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, arguing it was part of its business activities. The Assessing Officer and CIT(Appeals) denied this deduction.
What were the issues?
Whether interest income earned by a cooperative credit society on bank deposits is eligible for deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT999 citing7 SCC 90 · 2021
- Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Cooperative Ltd. v. ITO527 citing230 Taxmann 309 · 2015 · HC
- CIT v. Andhra Pradesh State348 citing12 Taxmann.com 66 · 2011 · HC
- Pr.CIT v. Annasaheb Patil Mathadi Kamgar Sahakari Pathpedi Ltd.71 citing454 ITR 117 · 2023 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH “SMC”, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM The present appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi dated 19.12.2025 for the assessment year 2018-19 as per the following grounds of appeal:
“1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in law and on facts in confirming the addition of Rs.24,70,630/- by denying deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. That the Ld. CIT(
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(a)(i)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- The Development Multipurpose Credit &… vs ITO Ward 2 (4), Porbandar, GujaratITA 458/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hislop College Employees Cooperative Credit… vs ITO Ward 2(3), NagpurITA 184/NAG/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026