DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIR - 2(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT vs. SHREE SAYAN VIBHAG SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDLI LTD, SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal observed that the excess payment for sugarcane was made to members and rightly distributed. The CIT(A)'s deletion of the addition regarding these payments was upheld. Consequently, the Revenue's appeals were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) concerning sugarcane purchase price, funds received under various schemes, and denial of deduction under Section 80P(2)(d). The assessee, a cooperative society, had its assessment completed under Section 143(3). The CIT(A) had partly allowed the assessee's appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether excess payments for sugarcane to members and interest income earned from a cooperative bank are eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d), and if additions made by the AO regarding various funds were justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 37(1),Section 80P(2)(d),Section 155,Section 145A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO1,283 citing322 ITR 283 · 2010 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-Ms SUCHITRA KAMBLE
PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
-
The captioned two appeal have been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the separate order dated 17.06.2025 & 18.06.2025 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC)/CIT(A), arising in the matter of assessment order passed under s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here-in- after referred to as "the Act") relevant to the Assessment Years 2011-12 & 2014-
Since the issues raised in these two appeal are identical, we are extracting the ground of appeal raised in ITA No.908/Srt/2025 for the purpose of adjudication.
ITA No.908/Srt/2025 for AY 2011-12
The Revenue has
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026