Section 155 of the Income Tax Act

The decision most relied on for Section 155 is CIT v. Karnataka Urban Infrastructure Development and Finance Corporation (284 ITR 582), cited in 73 of the 60 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 155

CIT v. Karnataka Urban Infrastructure Development and Finance Corporation
284 ITR 582 · 2006 · High Court
73
citing judgments

Funds received by an entity acting as a nodal agency or agent of the government for implementing specific government schemes, or income generated from such funds (like lease premiums or interest), are not taxable in the hands of the agency if held on behalf of or remitted to the government.

M Chockalingam & M. Meyyappan v. CIT
48 ITR 34 · 1963 · Supreme Court
27
citing judgments
National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. v. CIT
29 ITR 383 · 1998 · Supreme Court
25
citing judgments
2 (Telegana HC) (iii) Arun Kumar Bose v. ITO
151 Taxmann.com 412 · 2023 · Reported
18
citing judgments
CIT v. Hon’ble Kerala High Court
236 ITR 416 · 1999 · High Court
17
citing judgments
CIT v. HEG
294 ITR 438 · 2007 · High Court
13
citing judgments
Sandvik Asia Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.
2 SCC 508 · 2006 · Reported
10
citing judgments
Master Construction Co. (P) Ltd. v. State of Orissa
17 STC 360 · 1966 · Reported
9
citing judgments
Muthuraja v. CIT
369 ITR 483 · 2014 · High Court
9
citing judgments
CIT v. Needle Industries Private Limited
233 ITR 370 · 1998 · High Court
7
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 155

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIR - 2(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT vs. SHREE SAYAN VIBHAG SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDLI LTD, SURAT

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 908/SRT/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Feb 2026AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Mukesh Jain, CIT(DR)For Respondent: Shri Akshay M Modi, AR
Section 143(3)Section 145ASection 155Section 37(1)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SURAT vs. SHREE SAYAN VIBHAG SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDLI LTD, SURAT

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 901/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Mukesh Jain, CIT(DR)For Respondent: Shri Akshay M Modi, AR
Section 143(3)Section 145ASection 155Section 37(1)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, 13(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S. ORACLE FINANCIAL SERVICES SOFTWARE LTD, MUMBAI

In the result assesse appeal stands allowed and revenue appeal stands partly allowed as indicated herein above

ITA 5377/MUM/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Feb 2026AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Shri Girish Agrawal, ()

Section 1Section 10ASection 14ASection 155

ACIT-13(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. ORACLE FINANCIAL SERVICES SOFTWARE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result assesse appeal stands allowed and revenue appeal stands partly allowed as indicated herein above

ITA 1580/MUM/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Feb 2026AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Shri Girish Agrawal, ()

Section 1Section 10ASection 14ASection 155

DINESH CHAND JAIN,KANPUR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KANPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 692/LKW/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow17 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharat & Sh. Nikhil Choudharya.Y. 2012-13 Dinesh Chand Jain, Vs. Dy. Cit, 7/189, Swaroop Nagar, Kanpur- Central Circle-1, Kanpur 280002, U.P. Pan: Adbpj2732Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sh. P.K. Kapoor, C.A. Revenue By: Sh. R.R.N. Shukla, Add Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 17.02.2026 O R D E R Per Nikhil Choudhary, A.M.: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Ld. Ao Under Section 143(3) R.W.S. 154 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 On 28.04.2016. The Grounds Of Appeal Are As Under:- “1.1 Because The Id. "Cit(A)" Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Upholding The Action Of The Assessing Officer In Withdrawing The Refund Of Interest Amounting To Rs. 8,20,163/-, Paid To The Assessee U/S 244A Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 On Excess Amount Of Self-Assessment Tax Paid U/S 140A Of The Act. 1.2 Because The View Taken By Id. "Cit(A)" While Upholding The Action Of The Assessing Officer Is Based On Misinterpretation Of The Provisions Of Clause (B) Of Sub-Section (1) Of Section 244A Of The Act, As Applicable At The Relevant Point Of Time. 2. Because, In Any Case & Without Prejudice To The Grounds Hereinfore, While Upholding The Action Of The Assessing Officer In Withdrawing The Interest Paid To The Assessee U/S 244A Of The Act, The Ld. "Cit(A)" Failed To Appreciate That The Issue Of Payment Of Interest On Excess Amount Paid U/S 140A Was Debatable In Nature & It Could Not Have Been Decided By Invoking The Provisions Of Section 154 Of The Act As The Same Did Not Constitute A Mistake Apparent From The Record.

For Appellant: Sh. P.K. Kapoor, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. R.R.N. Shukla, Add CIT DR
Section 140ASection 143(3)Section 154Section 240Section 244Section 244ASection 244A(1)(a)Section 244A(1)(b)

PRAMOD SALVI,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 2(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

ITA 8667/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadavshri Sandeep Singh Karhailpramod Salvi 153, Poornanand Chs, Cr Dungarshi Road, Walkeshwar, Mumbai - 400006. ............... Appellant Pan: Aajps3189B V/S Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2(1)(1), Aaykar Bhavan, Maharishi Karve Road, ……………… Respondent Mumbai- 400020

For Appellant: Shri Tanmay Phadke, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Pravin Salunkhe, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 56(2)(x)

THUSE ELEKTRONICS PVT LTD,PUNE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-7, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, ITA No.2544/PUN/2025 is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2544/PUN/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Jan 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita Nos.2544 & 1890/Pun/2025 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14 Thuse Elektronics Pvt. Ltd., V Dcit, Circle-7, Plot No.33A, Sector -7, S Pune. Pcntda, Bhosari, Pune – 411003, Maharashtra. Pan: Aaact6285F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Nikhil Pathak Revenue By Shri Sandeep Sathe – Jcit Date Of Hearing 08/12/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/01/2026 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeal)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The A.Y.2012-13 & A.Y.2013-14 Dated 23.09.2025 & 09.06.2025 Respectively Emanating From The Separate Assessment Orders Passed Under Section 143(1) Of The Act, Dated 24.03.2013 & 26.09.2014

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 250

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BARDOLI, INCOME TAX OFFICE, BARDOLI vs. SHREE KHEDUT SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDALI LTD, BABEN, BARDOLI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 627/SRT/2025[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Surat23 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Modi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Jain, CIT. DR
Section 155Section 250Section 37(1)

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BARDOLI, INCOME TAX OFFICE, BARDOLI vs. SHREE KHEDUT SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDALI LTD, BABEN, BARDOLI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 626/SRT/2025[2011-12]Status: HeardITAT Surat23 Jan 2026AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Modi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Jain, CIT. DR
Section 155Section 250Section 37(1)

MAHARASHTRA AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI, DELHI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1366/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Dec 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Sandeep Singh Karhailshri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokarmaharashtra Airport Development Company World Trade Centre, Tower-1, 8Th Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai - 400005 ............... Appellant Pan: Aadcm9623M

For Appellant: Shri Rushab MehtaFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Perampurna, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 57

AMARJIT KAUR RANJIT SINGH ANAND,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 24(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 4377/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan () Assessment Year: 2018-19

For Appellant: Mr. Pratik JainFor Respondent: 30/09/2025
Section 250Section 56(2)(x)

HIMANSHU KUKREJA,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, , DEHRADUN

In the result, Appeal of the Assessee is dismissed

ITA 147/DDN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.Himanshu Kukreja Vs Income Tax Officer Matta Garg & Co. Ca 15- Income Tax Office, 13-A, Astley Hall, Dehradun, Subhash Road, Dehradun, Uttarakhand Uttarakjhand Pan:Ahipk9462F Appellant Respondent Assessee By Sh. S. K. Matta, Ca Revenue By Sh. A. S. Rana, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 12/11/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 23/12/2025

Section 13(1)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 263Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(vii)

M. SONS GEMS N JEWELLERY PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 4549/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma& Shri Amitabh Shukla[Assessment Year: 2015-16] M. Sons Gems N Jewellery Acit Pvt. Ltd. 4852/24, First Floor, Central Circle – 20 Near Sanjivan Hospital Vs New Delhi Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi Pan-Aadcm9406A Appellant Respondent Assessee By None Revenue By Ms. Monika Singh, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 28.10.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 17.12.2025

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 251Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 43B

RAJENDRA KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA, DURG,DURG vs. ITO, NFAC, DELHI, DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 744/RPR/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur12 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.744/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2020-21 Rajendra Kumar Shrivastava, Mig-42, Padmanabhpur, Durg (C.G.)-491 001 Pan: Alops3921M

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 154Section 154(2)(B)Section 154(8)Section 155Section 186Section 36Section 36(1)(va)

HIMMATBHAI MADHABHAI PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-5(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1552/AHD/2025[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Ahmedabad12 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalhimmatbhai M. Patel, Vs. Ito, 18, Kailash Dham Part-2, Ward 5(3)(1), India Colony Road, Bapunagar, Ahmedabad Ahmedabad-380024 [Pan :Aanpd 2497 D] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.N. Divetia & Shri Samir Vora, Ars Respondent By: Shri Kamal Deep Singh, Sr Dr Date Of Hearing 11.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 12.12.2025

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Divetia & Shri Samir Vora, ARsFor Respondent: Shri Kamal Deep Singh, Sr DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 263Section 56Section 56(2)(vii)

VALLABHBHAI BHAGVANJIBHAI KATHIRIYA,JAMNAGAR vs. ITO WARD 2(10) JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee, in ITA, No

ITA 513/RJT/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot24 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 510, 511 & 512/Rjt/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Hybrid Hearing) Vallabhbhai Bhagvanjibhai Vs. Ito Ward 2(10) Jamnagar Kathiriya Aayakar Bhavan, Jamnagar, Khitadia, Jamnagar, Jamnagar - 361006 Jamnagar – 361006 Pan No. - Αυτρκ7716N (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Chetan Agarwal, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. (DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 271ASection 69A

DEB PRASANNA CHOUDHURY,KOLKATA vs. ADIT/DCIT (IT) - 1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2199/KOL/2024[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Nov 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 131Section 133(6)Section 139(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 250Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(vii)

BAANI LANDBASE PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-4(2), NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 5944/DEL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.5944/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 बनाम Baani Landbase Pvt Ltd., Dcit, Corporate One, Ground Floor, Vs. Circle-4(2), Plot No.5, District Center, Jasola, Central Revenue Building, Delhi. I.P. Estate, Delhi. Pan No.Aadcb0237E अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 156Section 292B

JAVIDBHAI AHEMADBHAI MANSURI,PATAN vs. THE ITO, WARD-1, PATAN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1194/AHD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms. Suchitra R. Kamblejavidbhai Ahemadbhai Mansuri, Income Tax Officer, Vs. Prop. Aamil Surgical Hospital, Ward -1, Subhadranagar, Near C.T. Point, Patan Patan-384265 [Pan : Agnpm 6086 B] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Ganta Manoj Kumar G., Ca Respondent By: Shri B.P. Srivastava, Sr Dr Date Of Hearing 23.09.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 25.09.2025 O R D E R Per Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-:-

For Appellant: Shri Ganta Manoj Kumar G., CAFor Respondent: Shri B.P. Srivastava, Sr DR
Section 250Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(x)

EIGHT ROADS INVESTMENT ADVISORS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CENTRE , BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed, as per our aforesaid

ITA 2928/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2928/Mum/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2020-21 Eight Roads Investment Advisors Private Limited 16Th Floor, Plot No.82, Avighna House, Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli, Mumbai-400 018 Pan: Aabcf1370N ........अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax/Cpc, Bengaluru ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Ms.Chandari Shah a/wFor Respondent: Shri Himanshu Joshi, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 36(1)(va)

Showing 1–20 of 60 · Page 1 of 3