GLOBAL ADVANCED TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST,HOWRAH vs. CIT (EXMPTION), KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 18/KOL/2024Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 October 2024Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg (Judicial Member), Shri Sanjay Awasthi (Accountant Member)2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal set aside the CIT(E)'s order and restored the matter to the CIT(E)'s file for a fresh hearing. The CIT(E) was directed to provide the assessee with an adequate opportunity to present its case.

What were the facts?

The assessee's application for approval under Section 80G(5)(iii) was rejected by the CIT(Exemption) for want of prosecution and failure to furnish details. The assessee claimed this was due to confusion with a pending Section 12A application.

What were the issues?

Whether the rejection of the Section 80G approval application due to the assessee's absence was justified, considering the alleged confusion with other proceedings.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G(5)(iii),Section 12A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH KOLKATA

Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Per Sanjay Awasthi, Accountant Member :

1.

The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 03.11.2023 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Kolkata [hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(E)”] passed in form No. 10AD of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules”) in respect of rejection of approval/s. 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”).

2.

The Ld. Counsel for the assessee inviting our attention to the impugned order of Ld. CIT(E) has submitted that the application of assessee has been rejected by the Ld. CIT(E) for want of prosecution and on account of failure on the part of the assessee to furnish the required details. The Ld. Counsel submitted that assessee’s application for registration u/s. 12A was also pending before the Ld. CIT(E) and the Global Advanced Training & Education Trust. assessee under the impression that notice for the present appeal was in respect of proceedings u/s. 12B, did not participate in the proceedings relating to approval u/s. 80G of the Act and participated only in relation to proceedings relating to registration u/s. 12A of the Act. Accordingly, the absence of the assessee before the lower authorities was due to the aforesaid confusion. Considering the above submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee, impugned order of the Ld. CIT(E) is set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for hearing afresh on the application of the assessee. Needless to say that the Ld. CIT(E) will give proper and adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee to represent its case.

3.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes.

More judgments on Section 80G(5)(iii)

All 687 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G(5)(iii) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →