GLOBAL ADVANCED TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST,HOWRAH vs. CIT (EXMPTION), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(E)'s order and restored the matter to the CIT(E)'s file for a fresh hearing. The CIT(E) was directed to provide the assessee with an adequate opportunity to present its case.
What were the facts?
The assessee's application for approval under Section 80G(5)(iii) was rejected by the CIT(Exemption) for want of prosecution and failure to furnish details. The assessee claimed this was due to confusion with a pending Section 12A application.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of the Section 80G approval application due to the assessee's absence was justified, considering the alleged confusion with other proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH KOLKATA
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Sanjay Awasthi
Per Sanjay Awasthi, Accountant Member :
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 03.11.2023 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Kolkata [hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(E)”] passed in form No. 10AD of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules”) in respect of rejection of approval/s. 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”).
The Ld. Counsel for the assessee inviting our attention to the impugned order of Ld. CIT(E) has submitted that the application of assessee has been rejected by the Ld. CIT(E) for want of prosecution and on account of failure on the part of the assessee to furnish the required details. The Ld. Counsel submitted that assessee’s application for registration u/s. 12A was also pending before the Ld. CIT(E) and the Global Advanced Training & Education Trust. assessee under the impression that notice for the present appeal was in respect of proceedings u/s. 12B, did not participate in the proceedings relating to approval u/s. 80G of the Act and participated only in relation to proceedings relating to registration u/s. 12A of the Act. Accordingly, the absence of the assessee before the lower authorities was due to the aforesaid confusion. Considering the above submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee, impugned order of the Ld. CIT(E) is set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for hearing afresh on the application of the assessee. Needless to say that the Ld. CIT(E) will give proper and adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee to represent its case.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 80G(5)(iii)
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3149/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3148/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Shri Hari Har Charitable and Welfare Trust… vs ITO, FaridabadITA 7241/DEL/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2026-27
- Shree Vallabh Dham Charitable Trust, Delhi vs CIT(Exemption), DelhiITA 2516/DEL/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Shree Vallabh Dham Charitable Trust, Delhi vs CIT(Exemption), DelhiITA 2515/DEL/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026