SHRI HARI HAR CHARITABLE AND WELFARE TRUST,FARIDABAD vs. ITO, FARIDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the findings of the CIT(E) and the arguments of both parties. It noted that Section 80G(5B) of the Income Tax Act allows a charitable trust or institution to apply up to 5% of its total income in a year towards religious purposes without losing its tax exemptions under Section 80G. The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) had not brought on record the percentage of total income spent by the Trust on religious activities. Therefore, the Tribunal was of the considered view that the matter should be remanded back to the CIT(E) to verify this aspect after providing the assessee with an adequate opportunity of being heard. The assessee was also directed to file all necessary details and documents before the CIT(E) in a timely manner. No issue was expressly left undecided.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Shri Hari Har Charitable and Welfare Trust, filed an appeal against the order dated 25.09.2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh. The CIT(E) rejected the Trust's application for approval under Section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee primarily contested the CIT(E)'s findings that the Trust incurred expenditure on religious events and that a clause in its Trust Deed referring to religious activities disqualified it. The assessee argued that its dominant purpose is charitable, its religious activities clause is general and enabling, and it has not acted upon it. The CIT(E) relied on the judgment in Upper Ganges Sugar Mills Ltd vs CIT. The amount in dispute is not specified. The appeal was heard on 22.09.2026 and pronounced on 29.09.2026.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the learned CIT(E) erred in rejecting the appellant's application for approval under Section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the grounds that the Trust is established for charitable purposes and not for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste, as envisaged under the said provision. Assessee's Contention: The Trust is established for charitable purposes and not for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste. The clause in the Trust Deed referring to religious activities is general and enabling, not mandatory, and has never been acted upon. The dominant purpose is charitable, evident from its objects and actual activities, which fall within medical relief and advancement of general public utility under Section 2(15). The CIT(E) erred in invoking Explanation 3 to Section 80G and relying on Upper Ganges Sugar Mills Ltd vs CIT, which is distinguishable. Revenue's Contention: The learned DR relied on the order of the CIT(E) who rejected the application for spending money for religious purposes, without specifying the percentage spent on such activities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80G,Section 2(15),Section 80G(5)(iii),Section 80G(5B)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES ‘C’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY
PER KRINWANT SAHAY, AM:
Appeal in this case has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 25.09.2025 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh.
2 Shri Hari Har Charitable and Welfare Trust
Grounds of appeal taken by the assessee are as under:
“1. That the learned Commissioner of Income Tax Exemptions has erred in law and on facts in rejecting the appellant Application for approval under Section 80G sub section 5 clause iii of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without appreciating that the appellant trust is established for
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026