THE CHANDRANAGAR CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD,CHANDRANAGAR vs. ITO, WARD-2, PALAKKAD
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the disallowance of Section 80P deductions was incorrect as the relevant amendment by the Finance Act 2021 has prospective effect, and the assessment years in question (2014-15 and 2015-16) were prior to this amendment.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Chandranagar Co-operative House Building Society Ltd., claimed deductions under Section 80P for assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16. The lower authorities disallowed these deductions during the processing of returns under Section 143(1)(a)(v).
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of Section 80P deduction was valid for assessment years prior to the prospective amendment made by the Finance Act 2021.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh
O R D E R Per Bench These assessee’s twin appeals & 162/Coch/2024 arise against orders of the CIT(A)-3, Bengaluru in proceedings u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) as under : - DIN & Order No. Date No. 1 161/Coch/2024 2014-15 ITBA/APL/S/250/2023- 11.01.2024 24/1059626120(1) 2 162/Coch/2024 2015-16 ITBA/APL/S/250/2023- 11.01.2024 24/1059626278(1)
Heard both the parties at length. Case files perused.
We note at the outset that the sole substantive clinching issue herein is regarding correctness of both the lower authorities action disallowing the assessee’s & 162/Coch/2024 Chandranagar Co-operative House Building Society Ltd. section 80P deduction(s) of Rs.5,69,051/- and Rs.10,00,793/- in section 143(1)(a)(v) “processing” dated 03.06.2015 and 30.06.2016; assessment year-wise; respectively.
We next note that both the learned lower authorities could not have disallowed assessee’s sec.80P deduction claim in sec.143(1)(a)(v) “processing” once the corresponding amendment to this effect therein; by the Finance Act 2021, w.e.f. 01.04.2021, carries prospective effect only whereas we are in assessment years 2014- 15 and 2015-16. The assessee succeeds in it’s instant twin appeals. Ordered accordingly.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Basant Kumar Gupta vs. Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S Swapnashiyana Homes Developers Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- Jashim Uddin vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OrsGauhati · 1 Nov 2026
- Mohammed Khadeer Baig vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 1 Nov 2026