DY. C.I.T.1(2), RAIPUR (CG) vs. M/S HIRA POWER & STEEL LTD., RAIPUR (CG)

PDF · subscribers
ITA 361/BIL/2014Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 January 2018AY 2010-112 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the Revenue was not maintainable as it fell below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 21/2015 for filing appeals before the ITAT. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order which granted relief to the assessee. The tax effect of the relief granted was Rs. 6,23,780/-.

What were the issues?

Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the ITAT given the tax effect and CBDT circulars on monetary limits for appeals.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 14A,Section 40A(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR

For Appellant: Shri R.B.Doshi, AR
For Respondent: Shri R.M.Mujumdar, DR, Shri R.B.Doshi, AR
Hearing: 17/01/2018Pronounced: 18/01/2018

Per Shri N.S.Saini, AM: This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of the CIT(A), Raipur, dated 26.09.2014 for the assessment year 2010-2011. 2. The Revenue has taken the following grounds of appeal :- a. "Whether in law and on facts & circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the disallowance of Rs. 9,84,000/- u/s 14A of the IT Act, 1961?" b. "Whether in law and on facts & circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the disallowance of Rs.4,42,268/- made by the AO on account of fines/penalties, charity & donation?" c. "Whether in law and on facts & circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in restricting disallowance U/s 40A(3) of the IT Act, 1961 to Rs.2,85,997/- thereby giving relief of Rs.6,53,000/- ?" d. "The Order of the Ld. CIT (A) is erroneous both in law and on facts?" e. "Any other ground that may be adduced at the time of hearing?"

3.

At the time of hearing, the AR of the assessee submitted that the relief granted by the CIT(A) in this appeal is Rs.20,81,268/- and the tax effect of which is Rs.6,23,780/-, therefore, in view of the CBDT Circular No.21/2015, dated 10th December, 2015, appeal filed by the Revenue is not maintainable and, hence, liable to be dismissed.

2

4.

On the other hand, ld.DR for the Revenue agreed with the submission of ld.AR of the assessee. We find that the CBDT in Circular No.21/2015, dated 10th

5.

December, 2015, has stated that, as a measure for reducing litigation, it was increasing the monetary limits for filing of appeals by the department before the ITAT and High Courts and SLP before the Supreme Court. The said limit for not filing appeal to the Tribunal was fixed at Rs.10 lakhs. The CBDT has further stated that the said instruction shall apply retrospectively to pending appeals and that all appeals below the specified tax limits should be withdrawn/not pressed. However, appeals before the Supreme Court are to be governed by the limits operative at the time that the appeal was filed. The said Circular of the CBDT is binding on the officers of Income Tax Department. In view of this, we hold that the present appeal of the Revenue before the Tribunal is not maintainable and, hence, we dismiss the same in limine.

6.

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the Court on Thursday, the 18th Day of January, 2018 at Raipur. (PAVAN KUMAR GADALE) (N. S. SAINI) न्याययक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER ऱेखा सदस्य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Raipur; ददन ांक Dated 18/01/2018 प्र.कु.मि/PKM, Senior Private Secretary आदेश की प्रयिलऱपि अग्रेपिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अऩीऱ थी / The Appellant- 1. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent- 2. आयकर आयुक्त(अऩीऱ) / The CIT(A), 3. आयकर आयुक्त / CIT 4. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, विभ गीय प्रतततनधध, आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, Raipur / DR, ITAT, Raipur

5.

(Senior Private ग र्ड प ईऱ / Guard file.

6.

Secretary) सत्य वऩत प्रतत //// Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Raipur

More judgments on Section 14A

All 15,875 judgments and leading authorities on Section 14A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →