OTTAPALAM TALUK PRAVASI WELFARE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,PALAKKAD vs. ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. It held that since the delay in filing the return of income was condoned by the Principal CIT under Section 119(2)(b), the deduction under Section 80P should be allowed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative society, claimed a deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act. The return of income was filed belatedly, leading to the disallowance of the deduction by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A) based on Section 80AC.
What were the issues?
Whether a belatedly filed return of income, where the delay has been condoned, can still lead to the disallowance of a deduction under Section 80P. The applicability of Section 80AC in such circumstances.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80P,Section 80AC,Section 139(1),Section 119(2)(b),Section 143(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K., JM
O R D E R Per: Inturi Rama Rao, AM This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 12.04.2024 for Assessment Year (AY) 2019-20.
Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is a co-operative society registered the Kerala Co-Operative Societies Act, 1969. It is engaged in extending credit facilities to its members. The appellant Ottapalam Taluk Pravasi Welfare Co-operative Society Ltd. filed return of income for AY 2019-20 on 04.11.2019 disclosing Nil income after claiming deduction of Rs. 2,65,075/- u/s. 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). The said return of income was processed u/s. 143(1) of the Act vide intimation dated 28.05.2020 after making adjustments by disallowance of claim for deduction u/s. 80P of the Act and adding back by reversal of various amounts credited to the Profit & Loss A/c on the ground that the return of income was filed belatedly. Even on appeal before the CIT(A), the CIT(A) had confirmed the action of the CPC placing reliance on the provisions of section 80AC of the Act.
Being aggrieved, the appellant is in appeal before us in the present appeal.
There is a delay in filing the present appeal by 9 days. The 4. delay stated to have occurred as the order of the CIT(A) was served through email was overlooked by inadvertence. Therefore, it is prayed that the delay in filing the appeal be condoned. Keeping in view the salutary principle of law that ordinarily the litigant does not stands gain anything by filing the appeal belatedly. We are of the considered opinion that it is a fit case for condoning the delay. Accordingly we condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication.
Further, on merits it is submitted that the delay in filing the return of income was condoned by the learned Pr. CIT u/s. 119(2)(b)
Ottapalam Taluk Pravasi Welfare Co-operative Society Ltd. of the Act vide order dated 29.11.2024 and, therefore, it is prayed that the appeal be allowed by directing the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction claimed u/s. 80P of the Act.
On the other hand, the learned Sr. DR has not opposed the above submission made by the learned counsel for the assessee.
We have heard the rival contentions of both the parties and perused the material available on record. We find that the AO had disallowed the claim for deduction u/s. 80P of the Act primarily on the ground that the return of income was not filed within the due date prescribed u/s. 139(1) of the Act. Now the learned Pr. CIT, in exercise of the powers vested with him u/s. 119(2)(b) of the Act and also read with Board circular No. 13/2023 dated 26.07.2023 had condoned the delay in filing the return of income. Therefore, in the circumstances, we direct the CPC to amend the intimation by allowing the deduction u/s. 80P of the Act.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026