THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the penalties were not sustainable as the seized documents, which formed the basis for the additions and penalties, were found from a third party's premises and not the assessee's. Furthermore, the Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) that mere book entries are insufficient to establish a default under Sections 269SS or 269T without independent evidence of actual cash movement.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of penalties levied under Sections 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the CIT(A). The penalties were imposed for alleged violations of Sections 269SS and 269T, respectively, related to cash transactions.
What were the issues?
Whether penalties under Sections 271D and 271E are leviable when the evidence is based on documents seized from a third party and if mere book entries constitute a violation of Sections 269SS and 269T.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(30)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Dhakeshwari Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT1,061 citing26 ITR 775 · 1954 · SC
- Kishanchand Chellaram v. CIT962 citing125 ITR 713 · 1980 · SC
- CBI v. V.C. Shukla442 citing3 SCC 410 · 1998 · SC
- 109 TTJ 700 (Del) SMC Share Brokers Ltd. v. DCIT264 citing293 ITR 43 · 2007 · HC
- Mumbai), DCIT v. Vipin Aggarwal237 citing82 ITD 85 · 2002 · ITAT
- Dhirajlal Girdharilal v. CIT196 citing26 ITR 736 · 1954 · SC
- Vasantlal & Co. v. CIT193 citing45 ITR 206 · 1962 · SC
- CIT v. Lavanya Land (P) Ltd.172 citing83 Taxmann.com 161 · 2017 · HC
- Ashwani Kumar v. ITO122 citing39 ITD 183 · 1991 · ITAT
- Prakash Chand Nahata v. CIT103 citing301 ITR 134 · 2008 · HC
- T.S Venkatesan v. ACIT102 citing67 TTJ 247 · 2000 · ITAT
- Kishinchand Chellaram v. CIT87 citing4 Taxmann 29 · 1980 · SC · Read judgment
- Shri Dilipkumar Lalwani and Others (107 Appeals) 21 19.12 In Pr. CIT v. Vinita Chaurasia71 citing82 Taxmann.com 153 · 2017 · HC
- Bansal Strips (P) Ltd &Ors. v. ACIT63 citing99 ITD 177 · 2006 · ITAT
- Jayantilal Patel v. ACIT &Ors.54 citing233 ITR 588 · 1998 · HC
- UmacharanSaha& Bros co. v. CIT50 citing37 ITR 21 · 1959 · SC
- CIT v. Dayachand Jain Vaidya48 citing98 ITR 280 · 1975 · HC
- Pr. CIT Central III v. Lavnya Land Pvt Ltd.43 citing103 Taxmann.com 9 · 2019 · SC
- Krishna Kumar Singhania v. DCIT42 citing168 ITD 271 · 2018 · ITAT
- (ⅲ)Pooja Bhatt v. ACIT40 citing73 ITD 205 · 2000 · ITAT
- Pr. CIT v. Vinita Chaurasia39 citing98 Taxmann.com 468 · 2018 · SC
- Mohan Foods Ltd. v. DCIT25 citing123 ITD 590 · 2010 · ITAT
- CIT v. KP Varghese24 citing131 ITR 574 · SC
- ICDS Ltd. v. CIT24 citing10 SCC 529
- CIT v. Chandra Chemouse P. Ltd.22 citing298 ITR 98 · 2008 · HC
- KishinchandChellaram v. Commissioner of Income-tax20 citing19 CTR 360 · 1980 · SC
- 169 TTJ 54718 citing169 TTJ 547 · 2015 · ITAT
- 69 Taxmann.com 36618 citing69 Taxmann.com 366 · 2016
- Brij Bhushan Singal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax18 citing2018 SCC OnLine ITAT 2891 · 2018
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s.Roger Enterprises (P) Ltd.18 citing2012 SCC OnLine ITAT 11821 · 2012
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI B.M. BIYANI
Per Bench:
Feeling aggrieved by a consolidated appeal-order dated 31.05.2019 passed
by learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-3, Bhopal [“CIT(A)”],
which in turn arise out of respective penalty-orders dated 28.03.2018
passed by Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Central), Indore u/s 271D &
271E of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”], the revenue has filed the captioned thirteen (13) appeals for different Assessment-Years [“AY”] 2009-
10 to 2015-16. These are two sets of appeals, ITA No. 793 to 799/Ind/2019 are qua the penalties u/s 271D and I
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 271D
- Sujatha Vaddanapu, Nalgonda vs ITO, Ward-1, NalgondaITA 2048/HYD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Inder Lal Ramrakhyani, Dhamtari vs ITO, DhamtariITA 694/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Harshit Singhania Buildcon, RaipurITA 560/RPR/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shree Jalaram Finance, Borsad vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(4), PetladITA 1785/AHD/2026[2000-01]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2000-01
- Veera Mani Kumari Vattikooti, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward -11(1), HyderabadITA 1218/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026