ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. TRADING ENGINEERS (INTERNATIONAL) LTD., GURGAON
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was hit by the CBDT instruction due to low tax effect. The Departmental Representative did not provide any information regarding exceptions to the circular. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2008-09. The appeal was filed despite a CBDT instruction prohibiting appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs. 20 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable given the low tax effect and the applicability of CBDT instructions. Whether the case falls under any exceptions to the CBDT circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Before: SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR & BEFORE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR & BEFORE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR & SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARYSHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY
PER PRAMOD KUMAR PER PRAMOD KUMAR, , , , VP PER PRAMOD KUMAR PER PRAMOD KUMAR VP VP : VP This appeal by the Revenue for the assessment year 2008-09 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-41, New Delhi dated 3rd November, 2016.
At the time of hearing before us, we find prima-facie that the appeal of the Revenue is hit by CBDT instruction no.3 of 2018 dated 11.08.2018 whereby the Board has prohibited its subordinate authorities from filing of the appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the CIT(A) where the tax effect by virtue of the relief given by the CIT(A) is less than `20 lakhs. The instructions have been made applicable with retrospective effect, meaning thereby, these instructions are applicable on pending appeals also. In the present case, the tax effect on the quantum disputed by the Revenue does not exceed Rs.20 lakhs. Therefore, the present appeal of the Revenue is 2 ITA-646/Del/2017 hit by the CBDT Circular and hence not maintainable. Further, learned Departmental Representative has not pointed out whether the case of the Revenue falls within the ambit of exceptions provided in the Circular or not. Thus, keeping in view the above CBDT circular and provisions of section 268A of the Income Tax Act, we are of the view that the present appeal of the Revenue deserves to be dismissed. It is accordingly dismissed.
However, it is observed that, in case on re-verification at the end of the Assessing Officer it comes to the notice that the tax effect is more or Revenue’s case falls within the ambit of exceptions provided in the Circular, then the Department will be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for recall of this order. Such application should be filed within the time period prescribed in the Act. In view of the above, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed due to low tax effect.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Decision pronounced in the open Court on 31st July, 2019.
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026