THE PRL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. AUTOMATIC DATA SOLUTIONS AND TECHNOLOGY
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the withdrawal of the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Revenue sought to withdraw the appeal based on written instructions.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the Revenue's appeal should be withdrawn and dismissed due to its coverage under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas' scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD IMONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA INCOME TAX TRIBUN AL APPEAL NO: 670 OF 2017 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260-A of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A', Hyderabad in lTA.No.433/Hydl2015 for assessment year 2010-1 1 dated 28.02.2017 preferred against the order of the Additional Commissioner of lncome Tax (Transfer Pricing), Hyderabad PAN No.AAACW2655C dated 29.11.2013 preferred against the order of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1 (l), Hyderabad PAN. No.AAACW2655C, daled 28.O1 .201 4. Between: The Principal Commissioner Of lncome Tax -1, Hyderabad AND M/s. Automatic Data Solutions & Technology Services lndia Pvt. Ltd., 6-3- 1091lcl1, Fortune 9 Rajbhavan Road, Somajiguda, Hyderabad 500082 ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: SRI B. NARASIMHA SARMA, SC for lT DEPT. Counsel forthe Respondent: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER ...APPELLANT
THE llON'BLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL EIHtj)//\l'l AND Heard Mr. B lrlarasimha Sarma learned Standing Counsel for lncome Tax Department for the appellant. None appear : for the respondent Mr. B.Naras nha Sarma, learned Standing Couns,-'l submits on the basis of written inr tructions dated 07.06.2022 lhal the aprteal filed by the Revenue is require< to be withdrawn as the issue is covered under 'Vivad Se Vishwas' scheme. That being th; position, the related appeal is disrnissrxl on withdrawal. lnterlocutory \pplications pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/.I(.SRINIVASA RAO JOIUT REGISTRAR ,\ , \ \ . " ;{.\r:2\\\ t " SiE:CTION OFFICER To, . The Chairman, tr :ome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Elench 'A" Hvderabad. . T#"d;tI"'"al C, ,mmissioner of lncome Tax (Transfer Prk:ing), Hyderabad' . iii"'rj"prtv com nissioner of lncome Ta1 C1rqlel1 (1 )'-tly'Jerabad' . o"L-c-it"'sii B. Narasimha Sarma, SC for l T' Dept' [oPtjc] . Two CD CoPies . One Spare CoPY br .. \o \.x- 1 2 4 q, b s rHE H( IN',BLE MRS. JUSTTCE SUREPALLT N4NpA |TTA.NO.670 0F 2017 -( : R D E R (Perrhe Hon'ble SriJustice Uiial thuvanl
HIGH COURT DATED: 13106lit022 ORDER lTTA.No.670 o 2017 /.t.,16 )r t! I u S I4 ri-- /;' t' .i ii:, \,' ..\,i ,.:;r iiil l 1.,1 DISMISSING TI{E ITTA AS WITHDRAT [N WITHOUT COI iTS {
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026