THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S BHARAT HOTELS LIMITED
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court, following its decision in a related appeal concerning the same assessee, answered the questions of law in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Both parties jointly submitted that the questions of law in this appeal were already decided in a related case involving the same assessee.
What were the issues?
The appeal concerned questions of law that were previously decided in a related case involving the same assessee and the Revenue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2015
Present
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE S SUJATHA
Income Tax Appeal 392 / 2009 Between 1 Commissioner of Income Tax TDS
HMT Bhavan, Ganganagar
Bangalore
2 Tax Recovery Officer (TDS)
Range 18, HMT Bhavan
Ganganagar, Bangalore
Appellants
(By Sri K V Aravind, Adv.)
And
M/s Bharat Hotels Limited (Unit: The Grand Ashoka, Bangalore) Kumarakrupa, High Grounds Bangalore
Respondent
(By Sri Rupesh Jain for Sri D Prashanth Kumar, Adv.)
Appeal is filed under S.260-A of the Income Tax Act praying to allow the appeal and set aside the order dated 27.2.2009 in ITA 1085/Bang/2008, etc.
Appeal coming on for hearing this day, Vineet Saran J, delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
We have heared Sri K V Aravind, learned counsel for the appellants as well as Sri Rupesh Jain learned counsel for Sri D Prashanth Kumar for the respondent and have perused the record.
Learned counsel for the parties have jointly submitted that in view of the decision in ITA 393/2009 on 2.12.2015 in the case of the same assessee, the questions of law in this appeal also stand decided.
Accordingly, for the reasons given in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/s Bharath Hotels Limited decided on 2.12.2015 in ITA 393/2009, the questions of law are answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Sd/-
Judge
Sd/-
Judge an
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026