THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S INTERNATIONAL STONES INDIA PVT LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the appeal was not maintainable as the tax effect was less than Rs. 20,00,000/- as per Circular No. 21/2015. Therefore, the appeal was disposed of on this ground.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court against an ITAT order. The tax effect of the appeal was Rs. 18,01,269/-, which was below the threshold limit prescribed by the CBDT circular.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the appeal before the High Court due to the tax effect being below the prescribed monetary limit.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21st DAY OF MARCH, 2017
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.SUDHINDRARAO
I.T.A. NO.565/2016
BETWEEN :
The Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax, CIT(A) 5th Floor, BMTC Building 80 Feet Road, Kormangala Bengaluru-560 095.
The Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle-11(4), 2nd Floor, BMTC Building, 80 Feet Road, Kormangala Bengaluru-560 095.
… Appellants
(By Sri Dilip, Adv., for Sri K.V. Aravind, Adv.)
AND :
M/s. International Stoners India Pvt. Ltd., No.55/12, Alankar Apartments Flat No.1, 39th Cross, 14th Main, Jayanagar 4th T Block Bengaluru-560 041. PAN: AABCI 1821R
… Respondent
- 2 -
This ITA is filed under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961, arising out of order dated 20.01.2016 passed in ITA No.1475/Bang/2014, for the Assessment year 2011-2012, praying to formulate the substantial questions of law stated in the appeal and allow the appeal and set aside the orders passed by the ITAT, Bengaluru in ITA No.1475/Bang/2014 dated 20.1.2016 and confirm the order of the Appellate Commissioner confirming the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-11(4), Bengaluru.
This ITA coming on for orders this day the Court made the following:-
J U D G M E N T
The tax effect as per the memorandum of appeal is Rs.18,01,269/- which is less than Rs.20,00,000/-.
Hence, as per the Circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015, the appeal will not be maintainable. Hence, the appeal is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
*ck/-
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026