THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S MYSORE MERCHANT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that the questions raised in the appeals were already decided against the Revenue by a previous judgment of the same court. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against an ITAT order concerning assessment years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013. The appeals were filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
What were the issues?
Whether the substantial questions of law raised in the appeals were covered by previous High Court judgments. The core issue revolved around the applicability of a precedent to the current appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA No.133/2016 C/W ITA No.134/2016
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.133/2016 C/W INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.134/2016
BETWEEN :
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
TDS, 55/1, SHILPASHREE
VIDHYARANYA COMPLEX
VISHVESHWARANAGAR
MYSORE – 570 008
THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER
TDS WARD, 55/1, SHILPASHREE
VIDHYARANYA COMPLEX
VISHVESHWARANAGAR
MYSORE – 570 008
...APPELLANTS
(COMMON) (BY SRI E.I.SANMATHI FOR SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATES)
AND :
M/S MYSORE MERCHANT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. JAGANMOHAN PALACE ROAD MYSORE
...RESPONDENT
(COMMON) (BY SRI ARAVIND V. CHAVAN, ADVOCATE)
ITA No.133/2016 C/W ITA No.134/2016
-2-
THESE INCOME TAX APPEALS ARE FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 29.06.2015 PASSED BY THE ITAT, BENGALURU IN ITA NOs.87/BANG/2015 & 86/BANG/2015 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-2013 & 2011-2012 RESPECTIVELY.
THESE INCOME TAX APPEALS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Ag.CJ (Oral):
Sri E.I.Sanmathi, learned Counsel appearing for the appellants fairly submits that the questions raised in these appeals are answered against the appellants by this Court in CIT v. National Co-operative Bank Ltd. (Karn) [(2016) 387 ITR 702 (Karn)]. The appeals are accordingly dismissed.
Appeals dismissed.
Sd/-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026