THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT LTD

PDF · subscribers
ITA/834/2017HC KarnatakaKAHC01045978201706 December 2017Bench: L.NARAYANA SWAMY (AG.CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court noted that the question raised in the appeal had already been decided against the appellants by the same court in a previous case. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.

What were the facts?

The Income Tax Department appealed an ITAT order concerning Huawei Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. The department sought to formulate substantial questions of law and set aside the ITAT's order for the assessment year 2008-2009.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the substantial questions of law formulated by the appellant (Income Tax Department) were valid and merited consideration, given previous High Court rulings.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260-A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

ITA No.834/2017

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017

PRESENT

THE HON’BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

AND

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.834/2017

BETWEEN :

1.

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF

INCOME-TAX, CIT(A)

5TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING

80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA

BENGALURU – 560 095

2.

THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER

WARD-11(2), PRESENT ADDRESS

ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2)

2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING

80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA

BENGALURU – 560 095

...APPELLANTS

(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND & SRI DILIP, ADVOCATES)

AND :

M/S HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT. LTD. REGD. OFFICE: SY. NOS.37, 46, 45/3, 45/4 ETC., K NO .1540 KUNDALAHALLI VILLAGE BENGALURU – 560 037

...RESPONDENT

THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE

ITA No.834/2017

-2-

SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 31.05.2017 PASSED BY THE ITAT, BENGALURU IN IT(TP) A NO.459/BANG/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009.

THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Ag.CJ (Oral):

Learned counsel for the appellants fairly submits that the question raised in this appeal is answered against the appellants by this Court in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. [(2012) 349 ITR 98 (Karn)]. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Sd/-

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/-

JUDGE

More judgments on Section 260-A

All 2,570 judgments and leading authorities on Section 260-A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →