PR.COMMISSIONER vs. SHRI M N JAHANATH
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that the Revenue's counsel submitted that no substantial question of law arises in the appeals. The assessee's counsel had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals before the High Court against the orders of the ITAT. The Revenue's counsel later filed a memo seeking to withdraw these appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether a substantial question of law arises for consideration in the appeals filed by the Revenue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1/4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2018
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
I.T.A.No.122/2017 C/w I.T.A.No.121/2017 & I.T.A.No.123/2017
IN I.T.A.No.122/2017: BETWEEN : 1. Pr. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – [CENTRAL]
C.R. BUILDINGS, QUEENS ROAD
BANGALORE-560001.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CENTRAL CIRCLE 2[2]
C.R. BUILDINGS, QUEENS ROAD
BANGALORE-560001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI SANMATHI.E.I., ADV.)
AND : SHRI M.N.JAHANATH No.108/1, 5TH CROSS 3RD MAIN, MLA LAYOUT BHOOPASANDRA BANGALORE. PAN: AFUPJ 4182M.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI ARAVIND.V CHAVAN, ADV.)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER
Date of Judgment 21-06-2018, I.T.A.No.122/2017 & Connected Matters Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – [Central] and Another Vs. Shri. M.N.Jahanath
2/4
DATED 07.10.2016 PASSED IN ITA NO.1650/BANG/2014, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10, PRAYING TO (i) DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND / OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON’BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT AND SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 07.10.2016 PASSED BY THE ITAT, ‘B’ BENCH, BENGALURU, IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN ITA No.1650/BANG/2014 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10, AS SOUGHT FOR IN THIS APPEAL; AND TO GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED FIT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
IN I.T.A.No.121/2017: BETWEEN : 1. Pr. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – [CENTRAL]
C.R. BUILDINGS, QUEENS ROAD
BANGALORE-560001.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CENTRAL CIRCLE 2[2]
C.R. BUILDINGS, QUEENS ROAD
BANGALORE-560001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI SANMATHI.E.I., ADV.)
AND : SHRI M.N.JAHANATH No.108/1, 5TH CROSS 3RD MAIN, MLA LAYOUT BHOOPASANDRA BANGALORE.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI ARAVIND.V CHAVAN, ADV.)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 07.10.2016 PASSED IN ITA NO.1649/BANG/2014, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09, PRAYING TO DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND / OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON’BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT AND SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 07.10.2016 PASSED BY THE ITAT, ‘B’ BENCH, BENGALURU, IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN ITA
Date of Judgment 21-06-2018, I.T.A.No.122/2017 & Connected Matters Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – [Central] and Another Vs. Shri. M.N.Jahanath
3/4
No.1649/BANG/2014 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09, AS SOUGHT FOR IN THIS APPEAL; AND TO GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED FIT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
IN I.T.A.No.123/2017: BETWEEN : 1. Pr. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – [CENTRAL]
C.R. BUILDINGS, QUEENS ROAD
BANGALORE-560001.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CENTRAL CIRCLE 2[2]
C.R. BUILDINGS, QUEENS ROAD
BANGALORE-560001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI SANMATHI.E.I., ADV.)
AND : SHRI M.N.JAHANATH No.108/1, 5TH CROSS 3RD MAIN, MLA LAYOUT BHOOPASANDRA BANGALORE. PAN: AFUPJ 4182M.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI ARAVIND.V CHAVAN, ADV.)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 07.10.2016 PASSED IN ITA NO.1651/BANG/2014, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11, PRAYING TO DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND / OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON’BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT AND SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 07.10.2016 PASSED BY THE ITAT, ‘B’ BENCH, BENGALURU, IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN ITA No.1651/BANG/2014 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11, AS SOUGHT FOR IN THIS APPEAL; AND TO GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED FIT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, Dr. VINEET KOTHARI, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Date of Judgment 21-06-2018, I.T.A.No.122/2017 & Connected Matters Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – [Central] and Another Vs. Shri. M.N.Jahanath
4/4
J U D G M E N T
Mr. Sanmathi.E.I., Adv. for Appellants – Revenue. Mr. Aravind. V. Chavan, Adv. for Respondent – Assessee.
Learned Counsel for the Appellants-Revenue has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the appeals. He submits that substantial question of law does not arise in the present appeals.
The opposite Counsel appearing for the Assessee does not have any objection to withdraw the appeals filed by the Revenue.
Appeals are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026