THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ACI WORLDWIDE SOLUTIONS P LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The learned counsel for the Revenue expressed a desire to withdraw the appeal. The assessee's counsel did not object to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The assessee was represented by their counsel.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the Revenue's request to withdraw the appeal, which was granted by the court.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY 2018
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
I.T.A. No.1078/2017
BETWEEN :
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIT (A) 5TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 095.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE-1(1)(1), 2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 095.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND :
M/s ACI WORLDWIDE SOLUTIONS P. LTD., (FORMERLY KNOWN AS VISUAL WEB SOLUTIONS P. LTD.) NO.9, SALARPURIA CAMBRIDGE MALL CAMBRIDGE ROAD BENGALURU-560008 PAN:AAACV 7566R
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI NARENDRA KUMAR J. JAIN, ADV.)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 26.07.2017
Date of Judgment 02-07-2018, ITA No.1078/2017 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax & another Vs. M/s ACI Worldwide Solutions P. Ltd.
2/2
PASSED IN C.O.NO.105/BANG/2015, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR-2010-11, ANNEXURE-D. PRAYING TO: I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. II. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN C.O.NO.105/BANG/2015, DATED 26.07.2017 ANNEXURE-D AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE DRP CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), BENGALURU.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, Dr. VINEET KOTHARI, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Mr. K.V.Aravind, Adv. for Appellants – Revenue. Mr. Narendra Kumar J. Jain, Adv. for Respondent – Assessee.
The learned counsel appearing for the appellants- revenue wants to withdraw the present appeal. The other side is represented by learned counsel and he does not object for withdrawal of the appeal. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE ln.
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Noore Manpower Services vs. Commissioner Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 2 Nov 2026
- Maa Bhawani Minrals vs. Commissioner Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S. Nourangi Paints vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- Basant Kumar Gupta vs. Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S Swapnashiyana Homes Developers Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026