M/S TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR P LTD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LTU
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that the assessee had filed a review application before the Tribunal. In view of this development, the assessee sought to withdraw the appeals filed before the High Court.
What were the facts?
The assessee company filed appeals before the High Court against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The assessee subsequently filed a miscellaneous application before the Tribunal for review of its order.
What were the issues?
Whether the High Court should proceed with the appeals when a review application is pending before the Tribunal. The assessee's decision to withdraw the appeals due to the pending review application.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1/3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2018
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI
AND
THE HON’BLE Mrs. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
I.T.A.Nos.244 & 422 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor (P) Ltd., A Limited Company registered Under the provisions of Companies Act,1956 Having its office at Plot No.1, Bidadi Ind. Area, Ramanagara District, Karnataka-562109. Represented herein by its Authorized Signatory.
…Appellant
(By Sri. S.Nagananda, Sr. Counsel, for Sri. Sriranga S., Advocate)
AND:
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
LTU, JSS Towers, BSK III Stage,
Bangalore-560085.
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
LTU, JSS Towers, BSK III Stage,
Bangalore-560085.
…Respondents
Date of Judgment 3/7/2018 in I.T.A.Nos.244 & 422/2018 M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor (P) Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.,
2/3
These I.T.As. are filed under section 260-A of Income Tax Act 1961, arising out of order dated 08/09/2017 passed in IT(TP)A No.350/Bang/2014 & 336/Bang/2014, for the Assessment Year 2005-2006, Annexure-F, praying to (1) formulate the substantial question of law as stated above and answer those in favour of the appellant. (2) set aside the order dated 08/09/2017 in IT(TP)A No.350/Bang/2014 & 336/Bang/2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Annexure-F) insofar as it remits the matter to the AO/TPO, and allow the said appeal in toto and etc.,
These I.T.As. coming on for orders, this day Dr. VINEET KOTHARI J, delivered the following:-
JUDGMENT
Mr. S.Nagananda, Sr. Counsel for Mr. Sriranga S., Advocate, for Appellant
Learned senior counsel has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the present Appeals as the assessee has filed a Miscellaneous Application before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for review.
Date of Judgment 3/7/2018 in I.T.A.Nos.244 & 422/2018 M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor (P) Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.,
3/3
In view of the above, appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
ckl.
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026