THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. KITTUR RANI CHANNAMMA
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court took the memo on record and allowed the withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as not pressed.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Department filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the ITAT. The department sought to withdraw the appeal based on a circular issued by the CBDT.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal filed by the department should be withdrawn based on a CBDT circular regarding monetary limits for filing appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 18 TH DAY OF JULY 2018 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.NARENDAR AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD
ITA NO.713/2015
BETWEEN
THE COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS)
C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU-560001.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, BELAGAVI.
... APPELLANTS.
(BY SRI Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE.)
AND
KITTUR RANI CHANNAMMA MEMORIAL COMMITTEE & KRCRS SCHOOL FOR GIRLS, KITTUR, TQ: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI SANGRAM KULKARNI, ADVOCATE.)
- 2 - THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 12.6.2015 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI, AS SOUGHT FOR IN THE RESPONDENT-ASSESSEE’S CASE IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN ITA NO.417/PNJ/2013 FOR A.Y.2007-08, ETC.,. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, SRI G.NARENDAR, J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants files a memo in the Court dated 18.7.2018 whereby placing reliance on the Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July 2018, the appellant department desires to withdraw the appeal in the light of the fact that quantum of the disputed facts is less than fifty lakhs and that the circular is issued in terms of section 268A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and directed withdrawal of such appeals. Copy of circular No.3/2018 is also placed before the Court.
- 3 - 3. Memo is taken on record. Accordingly the appeal stands dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
Mrk/-
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026