THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. GOLF VIEW HOMES LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the Revenue to withdraw its appeal as it had become infructuous. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court under Section 260-A against an interlocutory order of the ITAT. During the pendency of this appeal, the main appeal before the ITAT was decided.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue against an interlocutory order of the ITAT had become infructuous due to the decision in the main appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2018 PRESENT THE HON’BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA ITA No.13/2014 Between: 1. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central Circle, C.R.Building, Queens Road, Bengaluru.
The Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central Circle-1(3), C.R.Building, Queens Road, Bengaluru. ... Appellants (By Sri.K.V.Aravind, Advocate)
And:
M/s Golf View Homes Ltd., No.73/1, 5th floor, Sheriff Centre, St.Marks Road, Bengaluru – 560 001. ... Respondent (By Sri.Prakash.D, Advocate for Sri.B.G.Chidananda Urs, Advocate)
Date of Judgment:16.07.2018 in ITA No.13/2014 The Commissioner of Income-tax and Anr. Vs. M/s Golf View Homes Ltd.
This ITA is filed under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act 1961, arising out of order dated 30.08.2013 passed in S.P.No.101/Bang/2013 (A/o out SP No.183/Bang/2012 in ITA NO.1252/Bang/2012) for the Assessment Year 2006- 2007 praying to 1. Formulate the substantial questions of law stated above, 2. Allow the appeal and set aside the orders passed by the ITAT, Bangalore S.P.No.101/Bang/2013 (A/o out SP No.183/Bang/2012 in ITA No.1252/Bang/2012) dated 30.08.2013 and confirm the order of the Appellate Commissioner confirming the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(3), Bangalore.
This ITA coming on for Admission this day, Dr.Vineet Kothari, J., delivered the following: JUDGMENT
Sri.K.V.Aravind, Adv. for Appellants – Revenue. Sri.Prakash.D, Adv. for Sri.B.G.Chidananda Urs, Adv. for Respondent – Assessee.
Learned counsels at the Bar informed that in view of the main appeal having been decided by the learned ITAT during the pendency of the present appeal filed by the Revenue before this Court under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the interlocutory order passed by learned Tribunal, present appeal filed by Revenue may be allowed to be withdrawn as they have become infructuous.
Date of Judgment:16.07.2018 in ITA No.13/2014 The Commissioner of Income-tax and Anr. Vs. M/s Golf View Homes Ltd.
Learned counsel for the Revenue has no objection for the same.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn having been rendered as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
dn/- (List No.1 Sl.No.1)
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026