M/S DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court upheld the office objections regarding the maintainability of the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The appellant, Delhi International Airport Limited, filed an Income Tax Appeal before the High Court of Karnataka. The appeal arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the Assessment Year 2010-11.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the appeal before the High Court of Karnataka due to jurisdictional reasons.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cited by 9 judgments on BharatTax
See all citing judgments →Counted from the text of the judgments hosted here. Most recent first.
- DCIT 7(3), Mumbai v. Wyeth Ltd ( Formerly Known As Wyeth Lederle Ltd), MumbaiMumbai · 2023-06-09
- Mufg Bank Ltd, New Delhi v. ACIT (International Taxation) Circle-2(2)(1), New DelhiDelhi · 2020-10-16
- Goldmohur Design and Apparel Park Ltd., Mumbai v. Pr. Comm. of Income Tax - 7, MumbaiMumbai · 2020-07-31
- The Mantola Cooperative Thrift & Credit Society, New Delhi v. ITO, New DelhiDelhi · 2019-06-12
- The Mantola Cooperative Thrift & Credit Society, New Delhi v. ITO, New DelhiDelhi · 2019-06-12
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ON THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.453 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
M/S DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NEW UDAAN BHAVAN, TERMINAL-3, INDIRA GANDHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, NEW DELHI, COMMUNICATION ADDRESS: NO.25/1, SKIP HOUSE, MUSEUM ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 025, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SRI NARAYANA RAO KADA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. ... APPELLANT
(BY SRI BALRAM R RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-10(1), C.R. BUILDING, IP ESTATE, NEW DELHI.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE – 2(2), 3RD FLOOR, C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001. ... RESPONDENTS
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 31.01.2018 PASSED IN ITA NO.3707 AND 4203/DEL/2013, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE; ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET-ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 31.01.2018 BEARING IN ITA NO.3707 AND 4203/DEL/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11.
*****
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The office objections on maintainability is upheld. The appeal is dismissed as not maintainable with a liberty to file a fresh appeal before the jurisdictional Court.
The documents as requested may be returned to the appellant to do the needful.
SD/- SD/- JUDGE
JUDGE
rsk/-
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026