M/S PRAKASH RETAIL PVT LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court disposed of the present appeal in terms of a previous order dated 14.09.2018. This previous order had remanded the matter for consideration by the Assessing Officer.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the High Court pertains to assessment years 2007-2008 and 2008-2009. The matter was previously remanded by the High Court for assessment years 2001-2002 to 2006-2007.
What were the issues?
Whether the current appeal should be decided based on a prior order that remanded similar matters for reconsideration by the Assessing Officer.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ON THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2019
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
ITA NO.438 OF 2018 BETWEEN:
M/S PRAKASH RETAIL PVT. LTD. OPPOSITE AMBALAPADY POST OFFICE UDUPI-576103 (REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI.SURYA PRAKASH K, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O SRI BOLA POOJARY) ...APPELLANT (BY SRI SUDHEENDRA B R, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1,CANARA TOWERS, MISSION HOSPITAL ROAD, UDUPI-576 101 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI E I SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
THIS ITA FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED: 09/02/2018 PASSED IN ITA NO.1537 & 1538/BANG/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007- 2008, & 2008-2009 PRAYING TO 1) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. 2) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BEARING ITA NO.1537 & 1538/BANG/2017, DATED:09/02/2018 WHICH UPHOLDS THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS); AND 3) PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS INCLUDING ORDER AS TO COSTS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ADMISSIONS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned Counsels on both sides submit that the matter is covered by the order dated 14.09.2018 passed in ITA No.724/2007 c/w ITA Nos.315-317/2013 with reference to the assessee’s own case.
The appeals were disposed off and the matter was remanded for consideration of the Assessing Officer for the assessment years 2001- 2002 upto 2006-2007. The present appeal arises out of the assessment years 2007-2008 and 2008- 2009.
In view of the submission made, the appeal is disposed off in terms of the aforesaid order.
Sd/- Sd/-
JUDGE
JUDGE
JT/-
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026