THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on a submission by the appellants' counsel regarding monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular.
What were the facts?
The Directorate of Income Tax and the Income-Tax Officer filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the appeal before the High Court due to prescribed monetary limits for such appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ON THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.161 OF 2011
BETWEEN:
1 . THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU
2 . THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER INTERNATIONAL TAXATION WARD-1(1) RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU ... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI: DILIP, ADVOCATE FOR SRI: K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NO.1, CAUVERY DIVISION
2 M/S BENGALURU WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD NO.720, 46TH CROSS 8TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU- 560 070 ... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI: B.S.BALACHANDRAN, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI: P.DINESH, ADVOCATE)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 04.01.2011, PASSED IN ITA NO.1071/BANG/2008, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2002- 2003, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO (i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN (ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN ITA NO.1071/BANG/2008 DATED 04.01.2011 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, WARD-1(1), BENGALURU, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
*****
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON HEARING FOR THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants submit that the appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary limits in terms of Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019
3 passed by Director (ITJ), Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi.
In view of the submission made, the appeal is dismissed as such.
Sd/-
Sd/- JUDGE
JUDGE
*bgn/-
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026