SRI. SATISH CHANDRA AMBLEE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER
What did the High Court hold?
The appellants' counsel filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the appeal with liberty to revive it later. The High Court accepted the memo and accordingly dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The appellants, Sri. Satish Chandra Amblee and Smt. Meena S. Amblee, filed an appeal before the High Court of Karnataka against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal pertained to assessment years 1995-96 and 1996-97.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal filed by the assessee should be allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to revive. The court considered the request for withdrawal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
I.T.A. NO.548 OF 2014 BETWEEN:
SRI. SATISH CHANDRA AMBLEE NO.1430, 13TH CROSS WEST OF CHORD ROAD 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560086.
SMT. MEENA S. AMBLEE
NO.1430, 13TH CROSS
WEST OF CHORD ROAD
2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560086. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. A. SHANKAR, SR. COUNSEL A/W SRI. M. LAVA, ADV.,)
AND:
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-11(1), R.P. BHAVAN OPP. RBI, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BANGALORE-560001. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) - - -
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 25-07-2014
PASSED IN ITA NO.65, 67 TO 68/BANG/2012 AND CO Nos.86 TO 89/BANG/12, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 1995-96 AND 1996-97, PRAYING TO: I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANTS. II. TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANTS IN THE ORDER DATED 25-07-2014 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH IN ITA NOs.65, 67 TO 69/BANG/2012 AND CO Nos.86 TO 89/BANG/12 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 1995-96 AND 1996-97.
THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Mr.A.Shankar, learned Senior counsel for Mr.M.Lava, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue has entered appearance through video conferencing.
Learned Senior counsel for the assessee has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal with liberty to revive the same, if so required. The aforesaid memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of liberty as prayed for.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026