COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MC DOWELL AND CO LTD

PDF · subscribers
ITA/180/2013HC KarnatakaKAHC01021859201310 November 2020Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court disposed of the appeal. It granted liberty to the revenue to revive the appeal if the matter fell within the exceptions mentioned in the CBDT circular regarding monetary limits for filing appeals.

What were the facts?

The revenue filed an appeal before the High Court against an ITAT order. The assessee's counsel pointed out that the tax effect was below the threshold specified in a CBDT circular, making the appeal not maintainable. The revenue sought liberty to revive the appeal if exceptions applied.

What were the issues?

Whether the High Court should entertain an appeal filed by the revenue when the tax effect is below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars. The applicability of CBDT circulars to binding the revenue.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260-A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD I.T.A. NO.180 OF 2013 BETWEEN: 1. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING

QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF

INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(3), BANGALORE. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADV.) AND: Mc. DOWELL & CO. LTD., (NOW KNOWN AS UNITED SPIRITS LTD.,) UB TOWERS, NO.24 VITTAL MALLYA ROAD BANGALORE-560001. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SURYANARAYANA T, ADV.) - - - THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 12-10-2012 PASSED IN ITA NO.189/BANG/2011, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2002-03, PRAYING TO:

2 I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN. II. SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 12-10-2012 PASSED BY THE ITAT, 'C' BENCH, BANGLORE IN ITA NO.189/BANG/2011, AS SOUGHT FOR IN THIS APPEAL. THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Mr.E.I.Sanmathi, learned counsel for the revenue. Mr.T.Suryanarayana, learned counsel for the assessee. 2. Learned counsel for the assessee submits that the tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.1 Crore and therefore, the appeal should not be entertained at the instance of the revenue in view of the Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. It is also submitted that the aforesaid Circular binds the revenue. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the revenue submits that he be granted liberty to revive the

3 appeal in case the matter falls within the exceptions under the aforesaid Circular dated 08.08.2019. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the appeal is disposed of with liberty as prayed for by the learned counsel for the revenue. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE RV

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →