INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,LTU(2), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal decided various grounds of appeal, some in favor of the assessee and some in favor of the revenue, based on co-ordinate bench decisions. Specific issues included deduction for bad debts and disallowance under Section 14A.
What were the facts?
The appeals by the assessee (Indian Overseas Bank) and the revenue concern assessment years 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18. The issues raised were largely covered by previous decisions of the Tribunal in the assessee's own case.
What were the issues?
The primary issues involved the allowability of bad debt deductions and the applicability of Section 14A for disallowances, particularly concerning securities held as stock-in-trade. The applicability of Section 115JB for banks constituted as 'corresponding new banks' was also a key issue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd.2,664 citing88 ITR 192 · 1973 · SC
- Maxopp Investment Ltd. v. CIT1,596 citing402 ITR 640 · 2018 · SC · Read judgment
- Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. DCIT1,183 citing328 ITR 81 · 2010 · HC
- CIT v. Smifs Securities Ltd.540 citing348 ITR 302 · 2012 · SC
- Escorts Ltd. v. UOI267 citing199 ITR 43 · 1993 · SC
- Dhanuka & Sons. v. CIT100 citing339 ITR 319 · 2011 · HC
- CIT v. P.V.A.L. Kulandagan Chettiar85 citing267 ITR 654 · 2004 · SC · Read judgment
- UCO Bank v. DCIT20 citing64 Taxmann.com 51 · 2015 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL & HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member)
The captioned appeals being ITA Nos.661/Chny/2019, 202/Chny/2023 and 203/Chny/2023 has been filed by the assessee and ITA Nos.914/Chny/20
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(vii)
- Bank of India, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, MumbaiITA 2810/MUM/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- ITO-41.3.4, Mumbai vs Urmila Syntex, MumbaiITA 2458/MUM/2026[2013]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026
- Dar Housing Limited, Nct of Delhi vs DCIT Central Circle- 15, DelhiITA 1881/DEL/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Small Industries Development Bank of India…ITA 870/MUM/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Small Industries Development Bank of India… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 9170/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026