ITO (TDS) 1(1)(2), MUMBAI vs. ARZOO.COM INDIA P.LTD, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that as per CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, the monetary limit for filing appeals before the ITAT by the revenue is Rs. 10 lakhs. Since the tax effect in this case was below the limit, the appeal was not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order for assessment year 2012-13. The assessee's counsel submitted that the tax effect was below Rs. 10 lakhs, making the appeal not maintainable as per CBDT Circular No. 21/2015.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the ITAT given the tax effect is below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “H”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI C.N. PRASAD & SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR
O R D E R
PER C.N. PRASAD, JM :
The appeal filed by the revenue is directed against the order dated 20.04.2015, passed by the Ld. CIT (Appeals)-59, Mumbai, for the assessment year 2012-13.
At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the Assessee submitted that the tax 2. effect in this revenue’s appeal is less than Rs.10 lakhs and therefore in view of CBDT Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, the appeal is not maintainable. The Ld. DR fairly submits that the tax effect is less than Rs.10 lakhs i.e. the amount of tax deductible at source is at Rs.9,49,281/- u/s 194/194J of the Act in this revenue’s appeal excluding the interest charged u/s 201(1A) of the Act.
M/s Arzoo Com India P.Ltd.
We found that as per the recent Circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015, issued by the CBDT, the monetary limit has been revised for filing of appeal before ITAT by the revenue fixing the tax effect limit of Rs.10 lakhs. In the instant case, the tax effect is below Rs.10 lakhs, therefore the appeal of the revenue is not maintainable and liable to be dismissed in limine. This Circular is retrospective and applicable to the pending appeals also.
Considering the above CBDT Circular, we found that this appeal of the revenue is not maintainable as the tax effect in this appeal is below Rs.10 lakhs. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal of the revenue.
In the result, appeal of revenue is dismissed.
Order has been pronounced in the Open Court on 6th March 2017.
Sd/- Sd/- RAMIT KOCHAR C.N.PRASAD लेखा सदस्य / न्याधयक सदस्य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai, Date : 6th March, 2017 LR, SPS
M/s Arzoo Com India P.Ltd. ITA No.3969/Mum/2015
More judgments on Section 194
- Income Tax Officer- 15(1)(1), Mumbai vs Glentrans Shipping & Logistics (I) Private…ITA 9299/MUM/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Omkara Impex and Merchandise LLP, Ahmedabad vs ITO, TDS Ward 2, AhmedabadITA 662/AHD/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jun 2026AY 2014-15
- Raj Kumar Palia, Bhopal vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax - Itarsi…ITA 453/IND/2025[2009-10]Status: Disposed3 Feb 2026AY 2009-10
- Aditi Infrabuild and Services Ltd., Delhi vs DCIT, Central Circle-30, DelhiITA 5970/DEL/2024[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Jan 2026AY 2019-20
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Bharat Coking Coal Limited, DhanbadITA 289/RAN/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed5 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026