ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 27, NEW DELHI vs. ASHOK CHATURVEDI, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Departmental appeal was not maintainable as it was filed against the Board Instructions regarding monetary limits for appeals. Therefore, the appeal was liable to be dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. The tax effect in the appeal was less than Rs. 50 lakhs, which was the enhanced monetary limit for filing appeals as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019.
What were the issues?
Whether the departmental appeal is maintainable before the Tribunal considering the monetary limits prescribed by CBDT circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “A” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
सुनवाईक�तारीख/ Date of hearing: 04.01.2021 04.01.2021 उ�ोषणाक�तारीख/Pronouncement on आदेश /O R D E R PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M.
This appeal by Revenue has been directed against the order of Ld. CIT(Appeals)-29, New Delhi dated 11.10.2017 for AY 2012-13.
We have heard Ld. Representatives of both the parties.
Admittedly, the tax effect in the Departmental appeal is less than to Rs. 50 lakhs. Vide Circular No. 3/18 dated 11.07.2018 issued by CBDT u/s 268A of the I.T. Act, it has been directed that the Department shall not file appeal before the Tribunal in case where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs. 20 lakhs. It is also directed that this Instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in the Tribunal. Pending appeals below this specified 1
ACIT Vs. Ashok Chaturvedi/ I.T.A.No.7629/Del/2017/A.Y.2012-13 tax effect may be withdrawn/not pressed. The aforesaid circular has been amended by issuing further Circular No. 17/2019, whereby the monetary limit for filing Income-tax appeals before the Tribunal has been enhanced to Rs. 50 lakhs. Ld. DR in view of the above Board Circular did not press the Departmental appeal. The case of the Department would not fall in the exceptions provided in the above Board Circular. In the result, the Departmental appeal is not maintainable as the appeal is filed against the Board Instruction referred to above and, therefore, the appeal of the Department is liable to be dismissed.
In the result, the Departmental appeal is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 04.01.2021.
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026