DEEPAK BUILDERS AND ENGINEERS INDIA LIMITED,DELHI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRLCE-30 NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

ITA 875/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 December 2025AY 2020-2021Bench: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member), SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (Accountant Member)6 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the satisfaction note recorded by the Assessing Officer was not explicitly clear as to whether the seized material had a bearing on the determination of the total income of the assessee. Relying on a High Court decision, the Tribunal held that the recording of Section 153C satisfaction is not a mechanical exercise and an improper satisfaction vitiates the assessment.

What were the facts?

Proceedings under Section 153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act were initiated against the assessee based on a search conducted on an entry operator. The Revenue argued that the satisfaction note for initiating these proceedings was validly recorded based on incriminating material found during the search.

What were the issues?

Validity of Section 153C proceedings due to improper satisfaction note by the Assessing Officer.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 153C,Section 143(3),Section 153A,Section 132,Section 131

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘E’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL

For Respondent: Ms. Amisha S. Gupta, CIT(DR)
Hearing: 01.12.2025Pronounced: 01.12.2025

PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM These assessee’s and Revenue’s cross appeals ITA No. 875/Del/2025 and 2100/Del/2025 for assessment year 2020-21, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-30 [in short, the “CIT(A)”], Delhi’s order dated 20.12.2024 passed in case no. 30/10740/2019-20, involving proceedings under section 153C r.w.

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 153C

All 9,619 judgments and leading authorities on Section 153C →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →