Saksham Commodities Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer

161 Taxmann.com 485High Court2024#488 most cited

What is Saksham Commodities Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer authority for?

Recording satisfaction under Section 153C for initiating proceedings against a third person is not a mechanical exercise; it requires a finding that seized material has a direct bearing on the third person's income, and improper satisfaction vitiates the assessment. Abatement under the second proviso to Section 153A is an inevitable consequence of a search, irrespective of the Assessing Officer's opinion on the material's impact.

191

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Saksham Commodities Ltd. · Section 153C satisfaction · Section 153A abatement · bearing on income · third party assessment · search assessment · vitiated assessment · mechanical exercise · Section 132

Also reported as

464 ITR 12024 SCC OnLine DEL 3851

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Saksham Commodities Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer

ANUP KUMAR AGGARWAL,PANHCKULA vs. ACIT(CENTRAL) SHIMLA, SHIMLA

Appeal stand allowed

ITA 1020/CHANDI/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Jan 2026AY 2022-23

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपीलसं./ Ita No.1020/Chandi/2025 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2022-23) Sh. Anup Kumar Aggarwal Acit (Central) बनाम/ Vs. House No.218,Sector-10 Shimla 171001 Panchkula – 134113 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Adjpk-5842-L (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Ajay Jain (Ca) A/W Shri Lovesh Bansal (Ca) – Ld. Ars ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Smt. Kusum Bansal (Cit) & Shri Rajat Kumar Kureel (Cit) – Ld. Drs Date Of Final Hearing : 27-01-2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 29-01-2026 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. Aforesaid Appeal By Assessee For Assessment Year (Ay) 2022-23 Arises Out Of An Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Gurgaon [Cit(A)] Dated 31-07-2025 In The Matter Of An Assessment Framed By Ld. Ao U/S 143(3) Of The Act On 27-09-2024. The Assessee Is Aggrieved By Confirmation Of Addition Of Rs.60.42

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Jain (CA) a/w Shri Lovesh BansalFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal (CIT) & Shri Rajat Kumar
Section 127Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 28

…6 Taxmann.com 199) rejecting extrapolation of incriminating material. It was held therein that the addition was to be restricted only to the extent of evidence found during the course of search. The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Saksham Commodities (161 Taxmann.com 485) has drawn similar analogy. The Ld. AR has also referred to various other case laws of Tribunal which has followed aforesaid decisions and rejected extrapolation by lower authorities. 5. Finally, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the action of Ld. AO in making impugned addition by extrapolating the unrecorded sales could not be…

VAAAN INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED,HARYANA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, NEW DELHI

ITA 1525/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jan 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. Manish Agarwalita No. 1524/Del/2025 : Asstt. Year: 2019-20 Ita No. 1525/Del/2025 : Asstt. Year: 2020-21 Vaaan Infra Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, Villa-8, Block-Ii, Eros Garden, Central Circle-30, Charmwood Village, Surajkund New Delhi-110055 Road, Faridabad-121009 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aadcv5910G Assessee By : Sh. Shiv Kumar Lath, Ca, Sh. Harish Kumar Choudhary, Ca & Sh. Mohit Choudhary, Ca Revenue By : Ms. Amish S. Gupt, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 28.01.2026 Date Of Pronouncement: 28.01.2026 Order Per Satbeer Singh Godara: These Assessee’S Twin Appeals For Assessment Years 2019- 20 & 2020-21 Arise Against The Cit(A)-30, New Delhi’S Din & Order Nos. Itba/Apl/M/250/2024-25/1072166771(1) & 1072172353(1) Both Dated 15.01.2025, In Proceedings U/S 153C R.W.S. 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “The Act”), Respectively.

For Appellant: Sh. Shiv Kumar Lath, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Amish S. Gupt, CIT-DR
Section 153C

…porate the clinching statutory expression “bearing” therein. We are afraid that the Revenue’s forgoing vehement contentions hardly deserves to be accepted since hon’ble jurisdictional high court’s recent landmark decision Saksham Commodities Ltd. v.ITO (2024) 464 ITR 1 has already settled the issue in the assessee’s favour that the Assessing Officer of the known search person/third party must indicate in his latter satisfaction note that the corresponding seized material does have bearing of determination of it’s total income. We thus conclude in this factual backdrop that both the impugned section 153C satisfact…

VAAAN INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JHANDEWALAN EXTENSION

ITA 1524/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. Manish Agarwalita No. 1524/Del/2025 : Asstt. Year: 2019-20 Ita No. 1525/Del/2025 : Asstt. Year: 2020-21 Vaaan Infra Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, Villa-8, Block-Ii, Eros Garden, Central Circle-30, Charmwood Village, Surajkund New Delhi-110055 Road, Faridabad-121009 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aadcv5910G Assessee By : Sh. Shiv Kumar Lath, Ca, Sh. Harish Kumar Choudhary, Ca & Sh. Mohit Choudhary, Ca Revenue By : Ms. Amish S. Gupt, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 28.01.2026 Date Of Pronouncement: 28.01.2026 Order Per Satbeer Singh Godara: These Assessee’S Twin Appeals For Assessment Years 2019- 20 & 2020-21 Arise Against The Cit(A)-30, New Delhi’S Din & Order Nos. Itba/Apl/M/250/2024-25/1072166771(1) & 1072172353(1) Both Dated 15.01.2025, In Proceedings U/S 153C R.W.S. 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “The Act”), Respectively.

For Appellant: Sh. Shiv Kumar Lath, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Amish S. Gupt, CIT-DR
Section 153C

…porate the clinching statutory expression “bearing” therein. We are afraid that the Revenue’s forgoing vehement contentions hardly deserves to be accepted since hon’ble jurisdictional high court’s recent landmark decision Saksham Commodities Ltd. v.ITO (2024) 464 ITR 1 has already settled the issue in the assessee’s favour that the Assessing Officer of the known search person/third party must indicate in his latter satisfaction note that the corresponding seized material does have bearing of determination of it’s total income. We thus conclude in this factual backdrop that both the impugned section 153C satisfact…

Showing 120 of 191 · Page 1 of 10

...