KRISH PACKAGING PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, NOIDA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the invocation of Section 153C requires the Assessing Officer (AO) to be satisfied that the recovered material has a bearing on the determination of total income for a specific Assessment Year. The Tribunal found that the satisfaction notes in this case failed to record reasons as to how the discovered material pertained to the relevant AY and impacted its total income. Therefore, the Tribunal quashed the reassessment order.
What were the facts?
The assessee preferred an appeal against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(A)-IV, Kanpur, which arose out of an assessment order passed by the DCIT under Section 143(3)/153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2011-12. The assessee raised an additional ground alleging that the assessment order was without jurisdiction as the proceedings under Section 153C were initiated without satisfying the statutory pre-conditions, specifically without recording a satisfaction note.
What were the issues?
Whether the proceedings initiated under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act are valid without a proper satisfaction note from the Assessing Officer regarding the bearing of recovered material on the total income of the relevant Assessment Year.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Saksham Commodities Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer196 citing161 Taxmann.com 485 · 2024 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order dated
2019 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(A)-IV, Kanpur
(hereinafter referred as Ld. First Appellate Authority or in short Ld. ‘FAA’)
in Appeal No : CIT(A)-IV/11778/DCIT-CC/Noida/2016-17/918 arising out
of the order dated 18.03.2016 u/s 143(3)/153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961
(hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) passed by the DCIT,CC, Noida for AY:
2011-12. 2. On hearing both
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026