ACIT, CC-30, NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI vs. DEEPAK BUILDERS AND ENGINEERS INDIA LIMITED, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the satisfaction note recorded by the Assessing Officer was not explicitly clear as to whether the seized material had a bearing on the determination of the total income of the assessee. Relying on a High Court decision, the Tribunal held that the recording of Section 153C satisfaction is not a mechanical exercise and an improper satisfaction vitiates the assessment.
What were the facts?
Proceedings under Section 153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act were initiated against the assessee based on a search conducted on an entry operator. The Revenue argued that the satisfaction note for initiating these proceedings was validly recorded based on incriminating material found during the search.
What were the issues?
Validity of Section 153C proceedings due to improper satisfaction note by the Assessing Officer.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153C,Section 143(3),Section 153A,Section 132,Section 131
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Saksham Commodities Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer196 citing464 ITR 1 · 2024 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘E’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM These assessee’s and Revenue’s cross appeals ITA No. 875/Del/2025 and 2100/Del/2025 for assessment year 2020-21, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-30 [in short, the “CIT(A)”], Delhi’s order dated 20.12.2024 passed in case no. 30/10740/2019-20, involving proceedings under section 153C r.w.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026